Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Alexander Berk, MD Assistant Clinical Professor Department of Emergency Medicine University of Florida College of Medicine - Jacksonville
Obligatory Disclaimer
I have no association personally or financially with any product or courses referenced in this talk Unfortunately.
Objectives
History and current use of tactical emergency medical support (TEMS) Epidemiology of injury in combat/tactical situations Phases of Tactical Combat Causality Care
Care Under Fire (Hot Zone) Tactical Field Care (Warm Zone) CausaltyEvacuation (Cool Zone)
TEMS
Tactical Emergency Medical Support
Out of hospital system of care dedicated to enhancing the probability of special operations law enforcement mission success and promoting public safety Non-military EMS services that have been modified for the tactical environment
TEMS Goals
Mission accomplishment Overall team health Care under fire Protection of team members, victims/hostages, bystanders and perpetrators
Is it needed?
Per 1,000 SWAT missions
3.8 officers injured 21.9 perpetrators injured 7.2 bystanders injured
Over 100 Tactical Emergency Medical Support units throughout the US and the world
TIME TO DEATH
KILLED IN ACTION
DIED OF Wound
Conclusion Imperative need to focus on battlefield/tactical medical care during the first 30 minutes after incident. Specialize training ofcombat lifesavers andEMT/paramedicsin Tactical Combat Casualty Care
Epidemiology of Injury
Preventable causes of death
Exsanguination from extremity wounds 66% Tension pneumothorax 30% Airway obstruction 4%
Blast injuries becoming increasingly more common Basically the biggest bang for your tactical buck
Overview
PROBLEM: ATLS is not designed to be used in the combat environment.
Not intended for combat medics Assumes hospital diagnostic and therapeutic equipment is readily available No tactical context
Overview
What are some tactical considerations?
Incoming fire Darkness Environmental factors (cold, heat, rain, sand) Casualty transportation problems Delays to definitive care Command decisions
Overview
ATLS
CPR C-spine immobilization Primary survey Definitive airway Tourniquets discouraged Two large bore IVs Fluid resuscitation Monitoring (EKG, pulse ox, BP, HR) Completely expose the patient Secondary survey
Does anybody see a problem with doing all of those things in the middle of a firefight?
Overview
Solution: Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) An evolving set of principles guiding trauma in the combat/tactical environment
Good medicine can sometimes be bad tactics Bad tactics can get everyone killed and/or cause the mission to fail The best possible outcome for both the personnel and the mission The right things to do AND the right TIME to do them
2004: BUMED
Coordinated through Naval Operational Medical Institute Continues to evaluate the effectiveness of the TCCC guidelines
Endorsed by:
American College of Surgeons National Association of EMTs Included in the PHTLS course curriculum
1. Care under Fire (Hot Zone) 2. Tactical Field Care (Warm Zone) 3. Casualty Evacuation (CASEVAC) Care (Cold Zone)
Overview
Active firefight
Try to keep from getting shot Try to keep casualty from sustaining more wounds
Additional firepower provided by the operator may be imperative for fire superiority
First rule of care under fire is to return fire
Limited personnel
May have only one trained medic
Overview
Care Under Fire
A Assess B Bleeding C Carry / Cover
Traditionally
A Airway B Breathing C Circulation
Assessment
No immediate management of the airway should be anticipated due to the need to quickly move the patient
Assessment
Is there active bleeding noted? Can they be put back in the fight?
Bleeding
Exsanguination from extremity wounds is the #1 cause of preventable death on the battlefield Hemorrhage was the cause of death in more than 2,500 casualties in Vietnam who had no other injuries Control of hemorrhage is the TOP PRIORITY
Bleeding
Tourniquet
(<20 sec, minimal attention, periodic reassessment)
Depending on the tactical situation, more time consuming measures will have to wait until Phase 2 Tactical Field Care.
The Tourniquet
Discouraged by ATLS Tactical Combat Casualty Care: It is the most reasonable choice to stop potentially life-threatening bleeding while giving care under fire It is immediate and definitive
Historical Fact
April 1862 The Battle of Shiloh
General Albert Sidney Johnson was one of Robert E. Lees senior commanders Dr. David Yandell, Command Surgeon for Johnsons Corps, directed all troops to carry a tourniquet into battle General Johnson suffered damage to his popliteal artery; an injury that can be controlled by a tourniquet Forgetting that he had one, General Johnson bled to death with the tourniquet in his pocket.
If massive extremity hemorrhage, better to risk ischemic damage to limb than bleeding out Non-life threatening bleeding should not receive a tourniquet Apply as close to bleeding site as possible Time should be noted Remove when feasible
550 soldiers of the IDF were treated in prehospital setting. Tourniquets were applied to 91 (16%) of patients in less than 15 minutes. 78% of applications were effective with higher success rates for upper limbs (94%) as compared to lower limbs (71%). Neurologic complications in seven limbs of five patients. Ischemic time ranged between 109 and 187 minutes. Not a single case of death resulting from uncontrolled limb hemorrhage was recorded during the four years.
QuikClot
Provides a hemoconcentration effect in blood that is exiting a wound Accelerates the bodys natural clotting process by increasing the concentration of platelets and clotting factors at the wound site FDA approved for external use only
How it works
The main component material is called Zeolite
Derivative of volcanic rock with many pores
Clotting factors, proteins, and cellular components of the blood are neither attracted nor held
They are simply too large to fit in the pore structure
Product FAQs
Allergies?
Physical reaction, not chemical or biologic No biological or botanical substances
Side Effects?
Exothermic reaction 85-90 degrees Celsius possible In vivo studies 37-42 degrees Celsius
Attempt to control bleeding with pressure dressing. If moderate to severe bleeding continues after 90 seconds, hold QuikClot package away from face and tear open tabs
Package down wind
Remove dressings to expose wound and wipe away as much excess blood and water as possible Immediately begin a gradual pour of QuikClot in a back-and-forth motion onto the source of bleeding
Try to keep QuikClot in wound ONLY.
QuikClot changes from its dry light beige color to a dark color as it absorbs moisture and induces clotting. Stop pouring promptly when you see a dry layer of QuikClot on wound surface IMMEDIATELY REAPPLY direct pressure or pressure dressing.
Do not use bare hands to apply pressure immediately following application of QuikClot If QuikClot causes heat discomfort to skin, brush excess granules away or flush gently with water Discard contents once open DO NOT REUSE
Randomized to (n = 6 animals per group) no dressing (ND), standard dressing (SD), SD and Rapid Deployment Hemostat (RDH) bandage, SD and QuikClot hemostatic agent (QC), or SD and TraumaDEX (TDEX). After 5 minutes, treatment was provided and limited volume 0.9% saline (1,000 mL over 30 minutes) resuscitation was started Blood loss, early mortality (180 minutes), and physiologic markers of hemorrhagic shock (e.g., cardiac output, blood pressure, hemoglobin, metabolic acidosis) were recorded.
Before the application of dressing (first 5 minutes), there were no differences in blood loss between the groups After application of wound dressing, decreased mortality was only statistically significant (p< 0.05) for the QuikClot hemostatic agent group (0% mortality) After application of dressings, the QC group had the lowest blood loss (4.4 1.4 mL/kg).
Bulky Gauze Dressing Pressure Dressings Tourniquet Burn Dressing Band-Aids Wound Disinfectant Iodine Tablets QuikClot
Both the casualty and the corpsman/medic are in grave danger while a tourniquet/dressing is being applied during the Care under Fire phase. Non-life threatening bleeding should be ignored until the Tactical Field Care phase. Tourniquet is the best, fastest, first line of defense More definitive treatment like pressure dressings and/or QuikClot may be applied given the tactical situation The decision regarding the relative risk of further injury versus that of exsanguination must be made by the operator rendering care.
Carry
Cervical Immobilization
C-spine immobilization (CSI) only needed for high velocity impacts (airborne, fast-roping, MVC, significant blast injuries) Only 1.4% of patients with penetrating neck injuries would benefit from CSI. Time to accomplish CSI was found to be 5.5 minutes, even with experienced EMTs Conclusion: The potential hazards to both patient and provider outweighed the potential benefit of CSI in penetrating neck trauma.
Carry
Cervical Immobilization
Treat parachuting injuries, fast-roping injuries, falls, and other types of trauma resulting in midline neck pain OR unconsciousness with CSI unless the danger of hostile fire constitutes a greater risk Fireman carry SHOULD NOT be used if cspine injury is suspected.
Casualty Movement
Firefighters carry One-person drag Two-person drag Two-person fore-and-aft carry Two-person rifle carry Poncho drag Stokes basket drag Litter Carry (2 man / 4 man)
Casualty Movement
Firemans Carry
Casualty Movement
One-Person Drag
Casualty Movement
Two-Person Drag
Casualty Movement
Casualty Movement
Casualty Movement
Poncho Drag
Casualty Movement
Casualty Movement
Situation dictates method No need to lift casualty No extra gear required Side position from casualty allows for better run/walk Rescuers facing forward to identify threats No need to leave packs or weapons
Review
TEMS: Advanced medical care in areas unsuitable for conventional EMS Get involved
International Tactical EMS Society (ITEMS): http://www.tems.org International School of Tactical Medicine: http://www.tacticalmedicine.c om C.O.N.T.O.M.S.: http://www.casualtycareresear chcenter.org EMT Tactical:http://www.tacticalm edic.us/Course_info.htm
Review
Rapid Assessment
Assess Bleeding (Control) Carry/Cover
Questions?
Acknowledgements
Tactical Combat Casualty Care in Special Operations. CAPT Frank Butler, MC(UMO/SEAL), USN. Tactical Combat Casualty Care Update 2003. Stephen D. Gieber, MD, MPH. Journal of Special Operations Medicine. Fall 2003 Battlefield Trauma Course. HM2(FMF/DV/PJ) Walker, HM1(DV/FPJ) Tague. Patterns of Injury and Effects on Delay of Treatment. Howard Champion, MD, FACS. SOMA 2003. Explosions, Explosive Devices, and Blast Injuries. Albert J. Romanosky, MD, PhD. SOMA 2003.