The country or nations which do not respect women have never become great nor will ever be in future.

Swami Vivekanand Violence against women is a manifestation of historically unequal power relations between men and women, which have led to domination over and discrimination against women by men and to the prevention of the full advancement of women.

2/20/2012

What Do We Mean By Domestic Violence

To understand the essence of the word domestic violence first of all we should know the meaning of the words domestic and violence separately. The word domestic means within the realm or the territory of house. And the word violence means action using physical force and intended to hurt or kill someone to cause damage. Thus the word domestic violence means an action or physical force which is being used within the realm or territory of house to intended to hurt or cause damage any particular subject in the domestic household. In other words we can say that it is an unpleasant and destructive natural force against the family member by one another.
2/20/2012 3

Domestic Violence can be described as when one adult in a relationship misuses power to control another. It is the establishment of control and fear in a relationship through violence and other forms of abuse. The violence may involve physical abuse, sexual assault and threats. Domestic Violence isn't just hitting, or fighting, or an occasional argument. It's an abuse of power. The abuser tortures and controls the victim by threats, intimidation, and physical violence.
2/20/2012 4

Types Of Domestic Violence

Physical violence Mental or Psychological violence Economical or financial abuse Sexual Violence or Sexual Abuse Verbal abuse

2/20/2012

Physical Violence
The word physical means Something related to body rather than mind or relating to things that you can see hear or feel.Thus, physical violence is that violence or exercise of power which has harmed the body. It is the intentional use of physical force with the potential of causing bodily injury, harm, disability, or death. SIRAJMOHMEDKHAN JANMOHAMADKHAN V. HAIZUNNISA YASINKHAN & ANR., (1981) 4 SCC 250

2/20/2012

Mental or Psychological violence

Violence which affects the human mind is called emotional violence. It is the deliberate act of doing something to make the victim feel diminished or embarrassed or isolated. This type of abuse is the hardest to spot because the injury is not physical or immediately visible. People undergoing emotional abuse are often seen to suffer from depression which puts them at an increasing risk of suicide, eating disorders, drug and alcohol abuse. SHOBHA RANI V. MADHUKAR REDDI, (1988) 1 SCC 105 CHETAN DASS V. KAMLA DEVI, (2001) 4 SCC 250

2/20/2012

Economical or financial abuse

Here, money is used as the means of having control over the partner. Thus we can say that when the abuser has complete control of the victims money and other economic resources, is called economic abuse. For example, if a person is earning for the fulfillment of his or her necessities but he is not free to spend his or her money according to their interest, there is another person commanding the expenditures, it is called economic violence. Section 5 clause (iv) of Protection of women from domestic Violence Act discusses economic abuse. VIJAY VERMA VS STATE N.C.T. OF DELHI & ANR., Crl. M.C. No.3878/2009
2/20/2012 8

Sexual Violence or Sexual Abuse

Sexual violence is somewhat related to physical violence, because it also violates the body s certain organs. It is any assault or unwanted act of a sexual nature. It can include anything from exhibitionism and exposures to pornography to unwanted sexual touching, to rape, to injuring or endangering the life or the victim. Section (3) clause (ii) of Protection of women from Domestic violence act deals with sexual abuse as such- Sexual abuse includes any conduct of a sexual nature that abuses huminilities, degrades or otherwise violates the dignity of women.Now a days child are also found to victim of sexual abuse.

2/20/2012

Verbal abuse
Verbal abuse is giving its meaning itself as such type of abuse which hurts somebody verbally or we can say that violence which is committed by the words either written or spoken Is called verbal abuse. It is also called as revealing is a form of abusive behavior involving the use of language. It is a form of profanity in that it can occur with or without the use of expletives. A.JAYACHANDRA V. ANEEL KAUR REPORTED IN (2005) 2 SCC 22
2/20/2012 10

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE ACT

In 1980 The Indian Womens Movement breaks the silence on domestic violence and demands legislative reforms. And the Amendments to the Dowry Prohibition Act were made. Again In 1992 the first draft of the Prevention and Protection of Women from Domestic Violence is prepared by the Lawyers Collective. Where Adv. Indra Jai singh ,(Senior Advocate Supreme Court of India) played an eminent role in drafting of the bill and in 1989, According to Indra Jai Singh the myth of the family as a sanctuary of tranquility and harmony, domestic violence is a veritable incongruity, a contradiction in terms. Violence shatters the peaceful image of the home, the safety that kinship provides. Nonetheless, the insidious nature of domestic violence has been documented across nations and cultures worldwide.
2/20/2012 11

In 1994 The National Commission for Women takes up the draft bill on domestic violence. In 2003 The NDA government brings in a bill on domestic violence, this bill sparks intense protests and is referred to a Parliamentary Committee for review. With the change of government the NDA bill dies. In 2003-2004: The signature campaign from 8 states collects 2.5 lac voices from the ground to demand an early passage of the Bill. In 2005 The UPA Government passes the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA, 2005). The Act receives presidential assent and enters in law books. 2/20/2012 12

After the Government of India passed the PWDV Act in October 2005, the task ahead of the women s groups was to see that the Act was notified at the earliest. Keeping this in mind, Action India calls First National Conference on PWDVA in February 2006 to pressurize the government for early action. Lastly in 2006 (26th October), after sustained pressure from women s groups, the rules to the PWDVA are notified and the law comes into force like this the historical development takes place and we got the Act.
2/20/2012 13

OTHER PROVISIONS RELATING TO VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN

The Indian Penal Code, 1860 under various sections provides protection to the women. Though there are some other enactments done by the British government after considering the worse situation of women. There are many provision in the Indian Penal code, 1860 like, Section 361 kidnapping from lawful guardianship, Section 366 kidnapping, abducting or inducing a woman, Section 372 selling minor for purposes of prostitution, Section 376 rape, Section 376-A intercourse by a man with his wife during separation, Section 376-B - intercourse by public servant with woman in his custody, Section 376-D intercourse by any member of the hospital with any woman in that hospital, Section 494 - remarriage , Section 498 -enticing or taking away or detain a married woman, Section 498-A cruelty against women, Out of these most important are Section 304-B Dowry death, 376 Rape, Section 498A Cruelty against women

2/20/2012

14

The demand for the criminalisation of dowry death and domestic violence was a culmination of all these struggles ending successfully in the enactment of Indian Penal Code, 1860,s. 498A in 1983, s. 304B in 1986 and corresponding provisions in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The criminalisation of domestic violence in the form of ss. 498A and 304B (dowry death) sought to increase the certainty and severity of legal responses, thereby correcting historical, legal, and moral disparities in the legal protections afforded to abused women. At present, there is no specific legislation in India to deal with sexual harassment of women at workplace. The Sexual Harassment of Women at their Work Place (Prevention) Bill, 2006 is pending approval from both the houses. The bill once passed aims at providing legal protection to women at workplace against any kind of sexual harassment ranging from staring to rape.

2/20/2012

15

the Supreme Court has laid down in the case of Vishaka vs. State of Rajasthan AIR 1997 SC 3011 are to be followed. These guidelines encompass a comprehensive definition of sexual harassment, directions for establishment of a complaint mechanism and the duty under which employers are obligated to obviate any such act.

2/20/2012

16

CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005

Although the Article 14 states about equality that does not mean that its against the men for that reason many voices come from mean all over the India to protest against this Act. This act is based on reasonable classification to equal opportunity to women in case public employment and in respect of life. The history show that whatever earlier women have suffered and they have been suffering therefore it is a remedy for them. Then Article 15-prohibition of discrimination on the grounds of sex, religion, caste etc. Article 15(3) - which is an exception to the art.15 (1) empowers the State to take affirmative measures for women. Then Article 16- provides for equality of opportunities in the matter of public appointments. The directive principles also explain about women like Article 39- enjoins the state to provide an adequate means of livelihood to men and women and Equal pay for equal work.

2/20/2012

17

Likewise, State to ensure the provision for just and humane condition of work and maternity relief. The fundamental duty on every citizen to renounce the practices derogatory to the dignity of women, Subject to the constitution parliament may make laws for the whole or any part of the territory of India, and the Legislature of a State may make laws for the whole or any part of the State. The Parliament is vested with the power of making laws for the whole or part of India for implementing any treaty, agreement or convention with any other country or countries or any decision made at any international conference, association or other body etc.

2/20/2012

18

All these provision are providing protection to the women but still there is need of new enactment. And it is the initiative by the Indian government by enacting such legislation and there is no doubt to say that this Act is constitutionally valid per se. with this discussion it is clear that this Act is constitutionally valid and therefore passed by the parliament of India.

2/20/2012

19

Constitutional Challenges to the Act

Several constitutional questions have risen with respect to the Domestic Violence Act especially that the legislation is genderspecific in nature and therefore arbitrary. Courts have unequivocally held that the Act is constitutional.

2/20/2012

20

In Aruna Parmod Shah v. Union of India, WP (Crl.) 425/2008, High Court of Delhi, (Decided on 07.04.2008) A mother-in-law sought to quash proceedings initiated against her under the Act. She challenged the constitutionality of the Domestic Violence on two grounds first, the gender-specific nature of the Act, by excluding men, is arbitrary and, hence, violates Article 14 of the Constitution; and second, the placing of near or like marriage status (relationships in the nature of marriage) at par with married status in Section 2(f) of the Act leads to the derogation of the rights of the legally-wedded wife. The gender-specific nature of the Act was held to be a reasonable classification in view of the object that the Act seeks to achieve and, hence, was held to be constitutionally valid. The Court rejected the second contention by saying that there is no reason why equal treatment should not be accorded to a wife as well as a woman who has been living with a man as his common law wife or even as a 2/20/2012 21 mistress.

The court opined that, like treatment to both does not, in any manner, derogate from the sanctity of marriage since an assumption can fairly be drawn that a live-in relationship is invariably initiated and perpetuated by the male.

2/20/2012

22

Similarly in Dennison Paulraj and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors., WP No.28521 of 2008 and M.P.No.1 of 2008, High Court of Madras, (Decided on 03.04.2009) a writ petition was filed by the husband and his family members challenging constitutionality of the Act and alleging that the proceedings initiated in the lower court was a complete abuse of process of law. The main grounds of challenge were first, the Act violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Indian Constitution as the law does not permit a husband to file an application against the wife; second, sections 4, 12, 18, 19, 23 and 29 of the Act were challenged as providing preferential treatment to the wife and hence, affecting the right to life and liberty of the husband and his relatives; and section 23 in particular was challenged as arbitrary and conferring unrestricted powers on the Magistrate. It was argued that special protection provided to women is intelligible differentia and hence, the gender-specific nature of the Act does not make it 2/20/2012 23 unconstitutional.

The Madras High Court held however that when the Constitution itself provides for making special provision for women, the contention that there could be no special treatment for women cannot be accepted. The court highlighted the fact that the Act was enacted as a special legislation for women in keeping with Article 15(3) of the Constitution. It was also pointed out that this provision on special measures has been widely used to enact legislations and executive orders for women and the courts have upheld their validity. The Madras High Court went on to cite several judgments of the Supreme Court where sex was held to be a sound classification under Articles 14 and 15. Hence, this writ petition was dismissed by the court.
2/20/2012 24

PROTECTION OFFICER
Chapter three of the THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 defines the powers and duties of protection officers. Section 8 states appointment of protection officer which states Appointment of Protection Officers.(1) The State Government shall, by notification, appoint such number of Protection Officers in each district as it may consider necessary and shall also notify the area or areas within which a Protection Officer shall exercise the powers and perform the duties conferred on him by or under this Act. (2) The Protection Officers shall as far as possible be women and shall possess such qualifications and experience as may be prescribed. (3) The terms and conditions of service of the Protection Officer and the other officers subordinate to him shall be such as may 2/20/2012 25 be prescribed.

This section empowers the State Government to appoint, by notification in the Official Gazette, such number of Protection Officers in each District as it considers necessary and also to notify the area in which such Protection Officer shall exercise the powers conferred and discharge the duties imposed under the Act. It also provides that the Protection Officers shall, as far as possible, be women and shall possess such qualifications and experience as may be laid down by the Central Government, by rules. The terms and conditions of service of the Protection Officer and the other officers subordinate to him may also be regulated by rules.

2/20/2012

26

Section 9 of THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACT, 2005 states the duties and powers of a protection officer, which states that: Duties and functions of Protection Officers.(1) It shall be the duty of the Protection Officer(a) to assist the Magistrate in the discharge of his functions under this Act; (b) to make a domestic incident report to the Magistrate, in such form and in such manner as may be prescribed, upon receipt of a complaint of domestic violence and forward copies thereof to the police officer in charge of the police station within the local limits of whose jurisdiction domestic violence is alleged to have been committed and to the service providers in that area; (c) to make an application in such form and in such manner as may be prescribed to the Magistrate, if the aggrieved person so desires, 2/20/2012 27 claiming relief for issuance of a protection order;

(d) to ensure that the aggrieved person is provided legal aid under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987 (39 of 1987 ) and make available free of cost the prescribed form in which a complaint is to be made; (e) to maintain a list of all service providers providing legal aid or counselling, shelter homes and medical facilities in a local area within the jurisdiction of the Magistrate; (f) to make available a safe shelter home, if the aggrieved person so requires and forward a copy of his report of having lodged the aggrieved person in a shelter home to the police station and the Magistrate having jurisdiction in the area where the shelter home is situated; (g) to get the aggrieved person medically examined, if she has sustained bodily injuries and forward a copy of the medical report to the police station and the Magistrate having jurisdiction in the area where the domestic violence is alleged to have been taken place; Milan Kumar Singh S/o Rajendra Singh and Rajendra Singh S/o Gulab Singh v State of U.P. and Smt. Swapnil Singh S/o Milan Kumar Singh
2/20/2012 28

(h) to ensure that the order for monetary relief under section 20 is complied with and executed, in accordance with the procedure prescribed under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974 ); (i) to perform such other duties as may be prescribed. (2) The Protection Officer shall be under the control and supervision of the Magistrate, and shall perform the duties imposed on him by the Magistrate and the Government by, or under, this Act.

2/20/2012

29

This section lays down the duties and functions of the Protection Officers. The Protection Officer may assist the Magistrate in the discharge of his functions under the Act, make a domestic incident report to the Magistrate, make an application to the Magistrate if the aggrieved person so desires praying for issuance of a protection order, ensure legal aid to the aggrieved person under the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, maintain a list of service providers, make available a safe shelter home if the aggrieved person so requires, get the aggrieved person medically examined if she has sustained bodily injuries, ensure that the order for monetary relief under section 20 of the Act is complied with and executed in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and perform such other duties as may be laid down by the Central Government, by rules. It also stipulates that the Protection Officer shall be under the control and supervision of the Magistrate and perform the duties assigned to him by the Magistrate and the Government by or under the Act.
2/20/2012 30

Section 4 of the act defines information to the protection officer, which states Information to Protection Officer and exclusion of liability of informant.(1) Any person who has reason to believe that an act of domestic violence has been, or is being, or is likely to be committed, may give information about it to the concerned Protection Officer. (2) No liability, civil or criminal, shall be incurred by any person for giving in good faith of information for the purpose of sub- section (1).
2/20/2012 31

Section 33 deals with if protection officer fails to discharge his duties, act states: Penalty for not discharging duty by Protection Officer.- If any Protection Officer fails or refuses to discharge his duties as directed by the Magistrate in the protection order without any sufficient cause, he shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to twenty thousand rupees, or with both. This section provides that any Protection Officer who fails or refuses to discharge his duties as directed by the Magistrate in the protection order shall be punished with imprisonment of either description which may extend to one year or with fine which may extend to twenty thousand rupees or with both.
2/20/2012 32

Section 34 deals with the Cognizance of offence committed by Protection Officer, which states No prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against the Protection Officer unless a complaint is filed with the previous sanction of the State Government or an officer authorised by it in this behalf. Protection officers have certain which powers with them like as mentioned in section 35 of the act Protection of action taken in good faith.- No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against the Protection Officer for any damage caused or likely to be caused by anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done under this Act or any rule or order made thereunder.

2/20/2012

33

Abha Arora v. Angela Sharma 148 (2008) DLT506

the court held that an order under the Act restraining the respondent from alienating, disposing of or disturbing possession can be made only in respect of a shared household and even a claim for alternate accommodation can be made only against the husband and not against the in-laws. Although the interpretation of shared household was intended to cover a broad range of intimate housing arrangements, the Indian Supreme Court narrowly interpreted the scope of the definition

2/20/2012

34

S.R. Batra v. Taruna Batra (2007) 3 SCC 169

A husband and wife lived together on the second floor of a house owned by the husbands mother. After some time, the husband filed for divorce and moved out of the house. The wife, who was locked out by her mother-in-law, applied for an injunction to prohibit her dispossession of the marital home. The High Court held that the wife was in possession of the matrimonial home and granted the injunction. The mother-in-law and husband appealed to the Supreme Court. The Act became effective while the case was pending in the Supreme Court, and the wife argued that sections 17 and 19(1) of the Act protected her right to remain in the shared household. She argued that the plain meaning of section 2(s), which defines shared household, encompasses not only a household where the victim lives, but also any household in which she has lived at any stage of the domestic relationship. The Supreme Court rejected the wifes argument, and removed from the scope of shared household a house owned entirely by a womans in-laws.

2/20/2012

35

 The Court held that section 17(1) of the Act entitles the wife to claim a right to reside in the shared household only when the house is joint family property. Here, the property did not belong to the husband, the husband did not pay rent, and the house was not joint family property. Therefore, the Court vacated the injunction, thus permitting the womans in-laws to evict her from the home if they so desired.

2/20/2012

36

Criticism in This Case

One of the criticisms of this opinion is that the judge disregarded the plain language of the Act. The language of section 2(s) expressly states: shared household means a household where the person aggrieved lives or at any stage has lived in a domestic relationship irrespective of whether the respondent or the aggrieved person has any right, title or interest in the shared household. Therefore, the Act is intended to protect the right to reside in the shared household no matter who holds title to the property. Although the Court criticized section 2(s) as being not very happily worded, and the result of clumsy drafting, Adherence to the plain meaning of the section would have led to a contrary conclusion. The Courts insistence that it give [section 2(s)] an interpretation which is sensible and which does not lead to chaos in society does exactly the opposite; this decision strains Indias commitment to end domestic violence by failing to consider some of the fundamental traditions underlying Indian culture. In a patriarchal society that prevents women from returning to their natal families after marriage, this decision may 2/20/2012 have a debilitating effect on the protections afforded under the Act. 37

Shalu Bansal v. Nitin Bansal CC 1250/1

The courts may be willing to find creative ways to circumvent the Supreme Courts narrow construction of the term shared household. In this case, a Delhi magistrate judge took notice of the Supreme Courts decision in Batra but held that the woman could not be dispossessed of the marital residence without due process of law, and in the event that she was dispossessed, the husband must pay the woman rent as maintenance. Therefore, it appears that even though Batra is a setback for the womens movement, judicial activism may find a way to keep it alive.

2/20/2012

38

Vandana v. Mrs. Krishnamachari & Ors. 2007) 6 MLJ 205 A suit for permanent injunction filed by the wife restraining the respondents from dispossessing her, the Madras High Court provided a broad interpretation to shared household and domestic relationship as defined under Section 2(s) and Section 2(f) of the PWDVA, respectively. The respondent-husband contested the right of the aggrieved wife to reside in the shared household under Section 17 of the PWDVA because the parties had not lived together in the shared household for even a single day after their marriage. The parties disputed even the very fact of marriage. The Court, upholding the right of the aggrieved wife to reside under Section 17, held that she has a de jure right to live in the shared household because of her 2/20/2012 39 status as a wife in the domestic relationship.

P. Babu Venkatesh & Ors. v. Rani

A criminal revision petition was filed by husband and family seeking reversal of an order of the lower court in an application filed by the wife under Section 23(2) of the Act, alleging dispossession from the matrimonial home. The Magistrates Court had granted a residence order and allowed the police to break open the lock of the shared household. The husband and his family contended that the house in question was, in fact, owned not by the husband but, by his mother, in whose name it was registered. Hence, it was not a shared household for the purposes of the Act.

2/20/2012

40

Dismissing this contention, the High Court of Madras held that the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in S.R. Batra v. Taruna Batra could not be applied to the instant case as the facts clearly demonstrated that the husband, with the intention of defeating the rights of the wife, had transferred the household into the name of his mother, after the matrimonial dispute arose. In arriving at its conclusion, the Court recognised the fact that, before the wifes dispossession, both parties resided jointly in the said household.

2/20/2012

41

Conclusion
The Service Provider is entrusted with the responsibility to record domestic incident report and get aggrieved person medical aid, legal aid and shelter. The Service Provider should be a registered organization as per Section 10(1) of the Act. The Protections Officers are to be attached with the Magistrates of the courts for the area notified for each protection officer. Therefore, the Protection Officers are required to function from all the district Courts and needs a premises within the court. For effective implementation, they need to be provided with vehicles for spot visits and making reports, staff to assist in maintaining records and corresponding with the aggrieved person, furniture and fixtures for establishing the office. The implementation of the Act provides for effective coordination and correspondence between Protection Officers, Police aggrieved persons and her family/relatives, district court, there is likely to be a number of cases being registered under the Act. This also requires a great coordination and monitoring among all these stakeholders as all the actions have to be reported within the specified time .

2/20/2012

42

Although the rules of the Act provide for appointment of Protection Officers only, there is requirement of a monitoring authority/officer in view of the volume of work in each case, and the number of cases likely to be registered under the Act. Accordingly, it is proposed that a Chief Protection Officer may also be appointed for addressing all the requirements under the scheme for implementation of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005. The Chief Protection Officer can function from office in Head Quarters of Department of Social Welfare.

2/20/2012

43