Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Onion
Research Approach
Research Strategies Time Horizons Data Collection
Research Philosophy
Your research philosophy depends on the way that
you think about knowledge is developed or created, how we gain understanding of things (epistemology). Your way of thinking will affect the way you go about doing research.
Generally, there are two key research philosophies, the positivism and phenomenology.
Research Philosophy Research Approach Research Strategies Time Horizons Data Collection
Positivism
Phenomenology
Philosophy - Positivism
You are working with an observable reality. Research can produce laws. Results can be generalised, similar to those produced by natural scientists. You are working objectively, with little or no personal interpretation of the data.
You need a structured methodology to gain quantitative data which is replicable and can be analysed using stats.
Philosophy - Phenomenology
You are researching human behaviour. This may be too complex to follow a definite law in the same way as the natural sciences. Generalisability is not of crucial importance, since we are focussing on a particular problem or situation Phenomenology highlights the details of the situation to understand a reality working behind them.
Research Philosophy Research Approach Research Strategies Time Horizons Data Collection
Positivism
Phenomenology
Data
Scientific principles Moving from theory to data The need to explain causal relationships between variables The collection of quantitative data The application of controls to ensure data validity A highly structured approach Researcher independence of what is being researched The necessity to select samples of sufficient size in order to generalise conclusions
Gaining an understanding of the meaning humans attach to events A close understanding of the research context The collection of qualitative data A more flexible structure to permit changes of research emphasis as the research progresses A realisation that the researcher is part of the research process Less concern with the need to generalise
Research Philosophy Research Approach Research Strategies Time Horizons Data Collection
Positivism Deductive
Inductive Phenomenology
Research Strategies
Survey Method
The survey method is usually associated with the deductive approach surveys are experiments. It allows the collection of a large amount of data from a sizeable population in a highly economical way. It is often conducted on questionnaire to answer those What and How questions. Its data are standardised and so allow easy comparison. It gives you more control over the research process, however, it takes time to design and pilot a good questionnaire.
Experimental Method
The Experimental Method is a classical form of research that comes from the natural science. The process usually involves: 1. The definition of a theoretical hypothesis. 2.Select a sample of a population. 3.Allocate samples to different experimental conditions. 4.Introduce planned change on one variable (the independent variable). 5.Measure the change of an associated dependent variable. 6.Control of other variables.
Research Philosophy Research Approach Research Strategies Time Horizons Data Collection
Positivism Deductive
Experimen t
Survey
Case Study
Time Horizons
Consider the amount of time you have, do you want your research to be a snapshot or a diary?
The snapshot reflects the cross-sectional studies. The diary reflects the longitudinal studies
Research Philosophy Research Approach Research Strategies Time Horizons Data Collection
Positivism Deductive
Experimen t Cross Sectional Survey Grounded Research Focus Group Longitudinal Ethnography Inductive Phenomenology
Case Study
Types of Data
Quantitative
Qualitative
Research Philosophy Research Approach Research Strategies Time Horizons Data Collection
Positivism Deductive
Experimen t Cross Sectional Quantitative Qualitative Longitudinal Ethnography Inductive Phenomenology Survey Grounded Research Focus Group
Case Study
Stages in a Research
Wish to do Research Literature Review Data Collection Report Writing
Data Analysis
Report Submitting
Negotiate Access
Title
Give a clear and succinct title, indicating the problem area around which the research will be undertaken. Word guide Title10-20 Abstract------------------words guide 50-100 Key words ........15-20
Please note following instructions. The proposal should include a list of references and a timeframe. The word count excluding references is 1500 2000
Background
Include a description of the background to your topic. Explain
Why you have chosen the topic Why you selected this particular industry for research Research Gap, mention at least 3 references who suggested this kind of work to be done in future.
Research Questions Here you should write your research questions as they emerge from the background and critical literature review. Research Objectives Here you outline your main objectives of your research? Develop these into 3-5 specific research objectives that begin with To and use higher level verbs Word Guide 500-750
Ethical Considerations
Plagiarism is acceptable up to only 15 percent excluding referencing. Before review and presentation Proposal will be tested for plagiarism Time frame Include a Gantt chart. Time line for each important task Alert us to any particular problems you are likely to face. Word Guide 150-200
Referencing
5 books and 20 research articles Using endnote software and in APA style
Annexure
Questionnaire, web information or any other report.
Categorical
Quantitative
Non-numeric
Numeric
Numerical
Nominalcategory No Order or Rank, just name Eg ; country name ,company name etc.
Ordinal ..Ranked categories but we dont know the difference Eg ; good , bad , excellent SA 3 A 4 Avg 3 D 2 SD 1
Interval . We ranked them with fixed distance between each data category ranked/order/zero is scale if comes in data ..does not nothing exist. Ratio .numeric zero mean nothing exists,Ranked F 0 10 20 10 20 30 Allow to do ratio
CHI SQUARE
Sample drawn from population Values must be mutually exclusive
CHI SQUARE
(Alternate Hypothesis)
(Null Hypothesis)
Descriptive Statics
Observed No Y N T 16 14 20 Expected No 10 10 20 Residual 6 -6 0
X2 (1)=7.20, P 0.05
We sampled 20 students and evaluated whether those of the students who worked was equal to the students who dont work. Data was analyzed choosing Chi Square of fitness test. NULL hypothesis was rejected X2(1)=7.2,P 0.05 More than half of the students work
T-Test
It detects the defenses between the means of two dependent variables.
Requirements
1. Sample from population. 2. Two scale measurement per participant. 3. Distribution of differences scores is quality normal.
1. People spend more time on watching movies (AH) 2. People spend more time reading books.(NH) One laid test Test Anova
Tests of data
1. Count 2. Average 3. Standard dev 4. T-Test
Average of two means are statistically different from each other SD,AVG,X does not tell us full story either two numbers are different