Professional Documents
Culture Documents
r
p
J
Angular Momentum
Classical
radius vector
from origin
linear
momentum
x y z
i j k
J x y z
p p p
=
x z y
J y p z p =
y x z
J z p x p =
z y x
J x p y p =
2 2 2 2
x y z
J J J J J J = = + +
determinant form of cross product
i x
j y
k z
i j k
x y z
J i
x y z
c c c
c c c
=
x
J i y z
z y
c c
c c
| |
=
|
\ .
y
J i z x
x z
c c
c c
| |
=
|
\ .
z
J i x y
y x
c c
c c
| |
=
|
\ .
2 2 2
x y z
J J J J J = + +
In the Schrdinger Representation, use Q.M. operators for x and p, etc.
P
x
= x = x
Substituting
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
Commutators
,
x y x y y x
J J J J J J ( =
Consider
x y
J J y z z x
z y x z
c c c c
c c c c
| || |
=
| |
\ .\ .
y z y x z z z x
z x z z y x y z
c c c c c c c c
c c c c c c c c
| |
= +
|
\ .
y x
J J z y z z x y x z
x z x y z z z y
c c c c c c c c
c c c c c c c c
| |
= +
|
\ .
,
x y
J J y z z x z z
x z z y z z
c c c c c c
c c c c c c
(
| | | |
( = +
( | |
\ . \ .
Subtracting
Similarly
substituting operators in units of
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
,
x y
J J y z z x z z
x z z y z z
c c c c c c
c c c c c c
(
| | | |
( = +
( | |
\ . \ .
, y x z
x y z
c c c
c c c
| | (
=
| (
\ .
, x y z
y x z
c c c
c c c
| | (
=
| (
\ .
,
z
i J z
z
c
c
(
=
(
, 1 z
z
c
c
(
=
(
z
P
z i
c
c
=
| | ( )| |
1 1
, 1 ,
z z
P z z P
i i
=
| |
,
z
z P i =
( )
1
1 i
i
= =
But
because
Using
,
x y z
J J i J ( =
,
x y z
J J i J ( =
Therefore,
in conventional units
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
,
x y z
J J i J ( =
,
y z x
J J i J ( =
| |
, .
z x y
J J i J =
The commutators in units of are
2 2 2
, , , 0
z x y
J J J J J J
( ( (
= = =
Using these it is found that
Components of angular momentum do not commute.
J
2
commutes with all components.
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
Therefore,
J
2
and one component of angular momentum
can be measured simultaneously.
Call this component J
z
.
Therefore,
J
2
and J
z
can be simultaneously diagonalized
by the same unitary transformation.
Furthermore,
| |
, 0 H J = (J looks like rotation)
2
, 0 H J
(
=
Therefore,
H, J
2
, J
z
are all simultaneous observables.
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
Diagonalization of J
2
and J
z
J
2
and J
z
commute.
Therefore, set of vectors
m
are eigenvectors of both operators.
2
J
z
J
and are simultaneously diagonal in the basis
m
2
J m m =
z
J m m m =
(in units of )
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
Form operators
x y
J J i J
+
= +
x y
J J i J
=
J
+
J
| |
,
z
J J J
+ +
=
| |
,
z
J J J
=
| |
, 2
z
J J J
+
=
2 2
z z
J J J J J
+
= +
2 2
z z
J J J J J
+
=
From the definitions of and and the angular momentum commutators,
the following commutators and identities can be derived.
Commutators
Identities
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
2 2
z
m J m m J m >
2 2 2 2
z x y
m J m m J m m J m m J m = + +
Expectation value
Because
Positive numbers because Js are Hermitian
give real numbers. Square of real numbers positive.
Therefore,
the sum of three positive numbers is great than or equal to one of them.
2
m J m =
2
2
z
m J m m =
2
m >
Now
Therefore,
Eigenvalues of J
2
is greater than or equal to
square of eigenvalues of J
z
.
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
z z
J J J J J
+ + +
= +
| |
,
z
J J J
+ +
=
Using
z z
J J m J J m J m
+ + +
( = +
J m m J m
+ +
= +
( )
1 m J m
+
( = +
Consider
eigenvalue eigenvector
Furthermore,
2
, 0 J J
+
(
=
2 2
J J m J J m
+ +
( =
J m
+
( =
J
2
commutes with J
+
because it commutes with J
x
and J
y
.
Then
eigenvalue eigenvector
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
Thus,
is eigenvector of J
z
with eigenvalue m + 1
and of J
2
with eigenvalue .
J m
+
J
+
is a raising operator.
It increases m by 1
and leaves unchanged.
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
J
+ m
Repeated applications of
to
gives new eigenvectors of J
z
(and J
2
) with larger and larger
values of m.
But,
this must stop at a largest value of m, m
max
because
2
. m >
(m increases, doesnt change)
Call largest value of m (m
max
) j.
m
max
= j
For this value of m, that is, m = j
0 J j
+
= 0 = j with
Cant raise past max value.
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
In similar manner can prove
J m
z
J
J
j
, 1, 2, m j j j =
J j
Operating repeatedly on
largest value of m
gives eigenvectors with sequence of m eigenvalues
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
2
m >
j
'
0 J j
'
= 0
'
= j
But,
Therefore, cant lower indefinitely.
Must be some
such that
with
Smallest value of m.
Cant lower below smallest value.
Thus,
j = j' + an integer.
largest value
of m
smallest value
of m
Went from largest value to smallest
value in unit steps.
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
We have
0 J j
+
=
0 J j
'
=
largest value of m
smallest value of m
J
J
+
0 J J j
+
=
0 J J j
+
'
=
Left multiplying top equation by and bottom equation by
2 2
z z
J J J J J
+
= +
2 2
z z
J J J J J
+
=
identities
Then
( )
2 2
0
z z
J J J J J j j
+
= =
( )
2 2
0
z z
J J J J J j j
+
' ' + = =
( )
2
0 j j J J j j
+
= =
( )
2
0 j j J J j j
+
' ' ' ' + = =
and operating
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
( )
2
0 j j J J j j
+
= =
( )
2
0 j j J J j j
+
' ' ' ' + = =
Because and
the coefficients of the kets must equal 0.
0 j =
0 j
'
=
( 1) j j = + ( )( 1) j j
' '
= +
Therefore,
and
Thus, the eigenvalues of J
2
are
1 3
0, , 1, ,
2 2
j =
( 1) j j = + and
(largest m for a )
The eigenvalues of J
z
are , 1, , 1, m j j j j = +
largest m change by unit steps smallest value of m
j j
'
=
Because j > j'
and
2j = an integer
because we go from j to j' in unit steps with lowering operator . J
= + +
Final results
There are (2j + 1) m-states for a given j.
Can derive
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
0, 1/2, 1, 3/2, 2, j =
0 0 00 j m = =
1 1 1 1
1/2 1/2, 1/2
2 2 2 2
j m = =
1 1, 0, 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 j m = =
3 3 3 1 3 1 3 3
3/2 3/2, 1/2, 1/2, 3/2
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
j m = =
2 2, 1, 0, 1, 2 2 2 2 1 2 0 2 1 2 2 j m = =
Angular momentum states can be grouped by the value of j.
Eigenvalues of J
2
, = j(j + 1).
etc.
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
( 1) j j +
( 1) j j +
2
J
Eigenvalues of are the square of the total angular momentum.
The length of the angular momentum vector is
or in conventional units
z
j = 1
m = 1
m = -1
m = 0
2
Eigenvalues of J
z
are the
projections of the angular
momentum on the z axis.
Example
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
2
J
z
J J
+
J
2
,
( 1)
j j m m
j m J jm j j o o
' '
' '
= +
, j j
z
m m
j m J jm m o o
' '
' '
=
( )( )
, 1
1
j j m m
j m J jm j m j m o o
' + ' +
' ' = + +
( )( )
, 1
1
j j m m
j m J jm j m j m o o
' '
' ' = + +
The matrix elements of are
The matrices for the first few values of j are (in units of )
2
(0) (0)
(0) (0)
z
J J
J J
+
= =
= =
2
0 1 0 0
0 0 1 0
3
0
0 1/2
4
1/2 0 3
0
4
z
J J
J J
+
| | | |
= =
| |
\ . \ .
| |
| |
|
= =
|
|
\ .
\ .
j = 0
j = 1/2
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
2
0 2 0 0 0 0
0 0 2 2 0 0
0 0 0
0 2 0
1 0 0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0 2 0
0 0 1 0 0 2
z
J J
J J
+
| |
| |
|
|
= = |
|
|
|
|
\ .
\ .
| | | |
| |
= =
| |
| |
\ . \ .
j = 1
j m
2
J
z
J
J
+
J
1 2
1 2
1 2 1 2 m m
m m
m m C m m
Operate with J
z
equal
These must be equal.
Other terms
=
+ =
1 2
1 2
0
if
m m
C
m m m
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
Largest value of m
= = +
max max
1 2 1 2
m j j m m +
=
1 1
m j =
2 2
m j
since largest
and
Then the largest value of j is
= +
1 2
j j j
because the largest value of j equals the largest value of m.
There is only one state with the largest
j and m.
There are a total of (2j + 1) m states associated with the largest .
= +
1 2
j j j
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
Next largest m (m 1)
= +
1 2
m m m
1 2
1 m j j = +
But
and
1 1 2 2
1 m j m j = =
and
1 1 2 2
1 m j m j = =
Two ways to get m - 1
Can form two orthogonal and normalized combinations.
One of the combinations belongs to
1 2
j j j = +
Because this value of j has m values
1 2 1 2 1 2
( ), ( 1), ,( ) m j j j j j j = + +
Other combination with
1 2
1 m j j = +
1 2 1 2 1 2
( 1), ( 2), ,( 1) m j j j j j j = + + +
1 2
1 j j j
'
= +
with
largest smallest
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
Doing this repeatedly
j values from
to
1 2 1 2
j j j j j = +
in unit steps
Each j has associated with it,
its 2j + 1 m values.
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
Example
1 2
1 1
,
2 2
j j = =
1 1
1
2 2
1 1
0
2 2
j
j
= + =
= =
j values
to
1 2 1 2
j j j j j = +
11 , 10 , 0 0 , 1 1
1 1, 0, 1
0 0
j m
j m
= =
= =
jm rep. kets
m
1
m
2
rep. kets
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
, , ,
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Know jm kets still need correct combos of m
1
m
2
rep. kets
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
Generating procedure
11
11 1 11
z
J =
Start with the jm ket with the largest value of j and the largest value of m.
m = 1
1 2
m m m = +
1 2
1 1
2 2
m m = =
1 2
1 m m + =
But
Therefore,
because this is the only way to get
1 1
11
2 2
= Then
jm m
1
m
2
Clebsch-Gordan coefficient = 1
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
Use lowering operators
1 2
J J J
= +
jm m
1
m
2
1 1
11
2 2
=
jm m
1
m
2
11 2 10 J
=
( )
2 2 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2
J J J J
+ = = +
1 1 1 1
1 1
2 2 2 2
= +
from
lowering
op. expression
from
lowering
op. expression
(Use correct j
i
and m
i
values.)
1 1 1 1 1 1
10
2 2 2 2
2 2
= +
Then
Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
( )( )
1 1 J j m j m j m j m
+
= + + +
( )( )
1 1 J j m j m j m j m
= + +
Plug into raising and lowering op. formulas correctly.
For jm rep.
plug in j and m.
jm
For m
1
m
2
rep.
1 2
m m
1 2 1 2 1 2
means m m j j m m
For must put in
when operating with
and
when operating with
2 1
an d J J
1 1
and j m
1
J
2 2
and j m
2
J
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
Lowering again
1 0 2 1 1 J
=
( )
2 1 2 1
1 2
1 1 1
1 1
2 2
2 2 2
m m m m
J J
| |
= + +
|
\ .
1 1 1 1 1 1
0 0
2 2 2 2
2 2
(
= + + +
(
1 1
1 1
2 2
=
Therefore,
jm m
1
m
2
Have found the three m states for j = 1 in terms of the m
1
m
2
states.
Still need
1 2
00
0 m m m = = +
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
1 2
0 m m + =
00 Need jm
0 m =
1 1 1 1
,
2 2 2 2
Two m
1
m
2
kets with
1 2
0 m m + =
The is a superposition of these. 00
10
1 1 1 1 1 1
10
2 2 2 2
2 2
= +
Have already used one superposition of these to form
1 1 1 1 1 1
0 0
2 2 2 2
2 2
=
00
10 orthogonal to and normalized. Find combination of
normalized and orthogonal to .
1 1 1 1
,
2 2 2 2
10
Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
Table of Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients
1 1 0 1
1 0 0 1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
j
m
1 2
m m
j
1
=1/2
j
2
=1/2
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
1 2
1 2
1
1
2
1 1
1, 0, 1 ,
2 2
j j
m m
= =
= =
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 0 0 1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2
1 2
3 3 1 1 3
, , ,
2 2 2 2 2
j j j m = + = =
1 2
1 1 1
,
2 2 2
j j j m = = =
3 3 3 1 3 1 3 3 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Next largest system
m
1
m
2
kets
jm states
jm kets
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007
1
1
2
1
1
0
1
2
2
3
0
1
1 1
1
2
m
1
m
2
3
2
3
2
1
2
3
2
1
2
3
2
3
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
1
2
3
2
j
m
j
1
= 1
j
2
= 1/2
2
3
2
3
1
3
1
3
2
3
1
3
1
3
1
2
1
2
1
2
Table of Clebsch-Gordan Coefficients
1 2 1 2
1 1 2 1 1 1
1 0
2 2 3 2 3 2
j m m m m m
=
Example
Copyright Michael D. Fayer, 2007