Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Whether a material is biocompatible is dependent on the physical function the biological response desired
Toxicity
Inflammation Allergy Mutagenicity
Materials
Toxicity
Body recognizes material as foreign & reacts disproportionately to amount of material present
Type l & lV Hypersensitivity reactions
Local effects
Pulp Periodontium
Root apex
Gingival inflammation
Depends on
Ability to distribute to these sites Concentration Exposure time
Systemic effects
Access through
Ingestion & absorption in gut Inhaled vapor Release at tooth apex Absorption through oral mucosa
Principle
Small alterations in cells of immune system by materials can have significant biological consequences
Monocytes
Material
Secretes substances
Chronic inflammation
Usage test
Animal In vitro
Material/extract contact cell, enzyme or other isolated biological system Contact- direct or indirect
Types
Measure cell growth/death Determine cellular function of some kind Evaluate integrity of genetic material
Types
Long/short term systemic toxicity test Exposure to intact/abraded membrane Bone response
Advantage Allows material to interact with several biological systems in animal- more complete bio response
Disadvantage Expensive, time taking, difficult to control Ethical issues Relevance to human species questionable
Material place in environment clinically relevant to use of material in practice Humans - clinical trials
Disadvantage Complex, long, expensive, difficult to control & interpret Ethical committee approval Legal liabilities
Three phases
Primary Secondary Usage
In animal or
In humans
Usage
Usage
Secondary
Primary
Secondary Primary
Eczema
Wheezing
Angioneurotic edema
Nickel Alloys for crown, dentures, ortho appliances Most allergenic metal used Nickel allergy- women Cross reactivity Ni & Pd allergy Ni2+: mutagenesis (no CA) Inflammatory reactions
Dental resins
Composites- Bis-phenol A act on estrogenic receptors- estrogenicity 1000 times less potent as natural estrogen