Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Directly comparing California Bearing Ratio test with the new European Volumetric Expansion test.
Materials to be considered are fine grained stabilised soils Stabilisation: As the name implies, involves a ground improvement technique which alters the properties of the existing soil, so as to create a new site material capable of better meeting the task in hand.
Background
Current concerns are that the CBR swell test may be giving a green light to certain materials which would, when subjected to site conditions, react in a different way.
Conversely, the new European test may be giving a red light to potentially suitable projects.
Volumetric Expansion New BS prEN13286-49 Un-tested on UK soils? Binder suitability Degree of pulverisation (6.3mm BS Test sieve) Specimen manufacture (96% of Standard Proctor density) Curing regime (1.5 x workability of binder) Density related Moisture related Grading related What expectations have we?
Volumetric Expansion New Modified procedure Larger specimen size Wider range of materials Representative sampling Degree of pulverisation Site equipment (MCV) Realistic curing times & temperatures
In 1962 Sherwood conducted a trial looking at the effects of sulphates on cement and lime stabilisation. One part of the paper looks at the effect of immersion and percentage clay fraction against sulphate content. It concludes that under certain conditions lime or cement treated soils are more likely to disintegrate when the soil contains a high clay fraction, when in the presence of sulphate solution. It also showed that when the clay fraction is removed, the risk of disintegration is also removed. The report clearly achieved what it set out to achieve, and that was to create an environment in the laboratory where, when one element was added or removed from the mix, a change in characteristics could be monitored. (Unconfined soaked specimens were used as the control test).
Lime/Lime and Cement Stabilisation First major problems occurred in the UK in the late 1980s: Saxmunden Bypass (Conclusion better site control required) M40 Banbury IV Contract Initial views: very hot summer during the period of stabilisation Insufficient water added. Investigation showed CBR specimens did not saturate throughout as had occurred in the field More water had been absorbed at the top of the CBR specimen than at the bottom Evident at the end of the tests that the conditions which had occurred in the field HAD NOT been replicated in the laboratory Considering the amount of heave recorded on site and the relatively short time that it took to develop, it does ask questions as to why this could not be repeated in the laboratory? The conclusion drawn was that the mineralogy of the soil had the potential to develop additional sulphate due to the oxidation of sulphides.
Durability
There are many ways to define durability, but for simplicity I have chosen to sub-divide them into two groups:
Chemical durability, and Design durability Chemical durability can be defined as the susceptibility of the material to
deteriorate in the presence of certain chemical elements (ie. Sulphides, sulphates and Organics etc).
deteriorate due to the workmanship or design elements (i.e. inadequate compaction, frost, poor choice of binder, etc) I believe certain contractors and consultants are currently using the CBR test as both a chemical durability and design durability test.
TRL 505
The report adopted a testing program based on 7 cohesive soils taken from around the UK, namely: Mercia Mudstone Oxford Clay Lower Lias Clay London Clay Gault Clay Weald Clay Kimmeridge Clay There was a wide range of total potential sulphates of between <0.1 to 4.75% SO 3. It is worth noting that none of the 62 CBR specimens tested failed the upper limit stated in HA74, and only one test had a swell in excess of the upper 5mm average swell value allowed in HA74. TRL Report 505 concluded: The currently specified laboratory tests for lime stabilisation of capping materials, including the swell test procedure, are effective performance indicators for mix design and long-term durability. It is recommended that the swell test procedure be retained in the UK specification in its current form. The swell limits currently specified in the UK Advice Note (HA74) on lime treatment are considered to be appropriate for the typical range of British Clays stabilised in the trial, and should not be altered. The results in the Report TRL 505 seem therefore to confirm the experiences reported by Snedker after the M40 failure, not contradict it, therefore disagreeing with its own conclusions.
As can be seen from the above results, the material would pass the HA CBR swell limits, whereas some of the tests fail the CEN Sv limits, and others require the material to be investigated further. The above results also concur with my conclusions from the literature review that the two tests do not give the same results, and that further work is needed.
Further Comments/Questions
When stabilising a Soil are we looking for a Permanent average CBR value of >15% HA74/07 has changed to assess the 28day soaked CBR value (for lab mixes only) The Current CBR test is at Proctor density yet the field work could be considerably less
The french use very high binders compared to us in the UK (similar to B.A.A. 3% Lime + 5% Cement). This could be why their stabilised materials are more stable under soaking, and pass the volumetric test.
Reducing the plastic characteristics of a soil should make a material less susceptible to heave. By using the CBR swell test as the control for suitability, we could be taking an undue risk, as it does not seem to fail a material.
Soil Types
Many different types of soils: Gravel Sand Silt Clay Clays themselves can be further sub-divided into hundreds of different clay mineral types, three principle types are:
Kaolin Illite Montmorillonite (Member of the Smectite group) 1m 0.1m 0.01m Non-swelling, Low plasticity, low cohesion Expansive, medium plasticity, low permeability Highly expansive, Very plastic, extremely low permeability
Problematic Soils
Grim 1962 set out two types of swelling characteristics in clay soils, namely Intercrystalline and Intracrystalline swelling.
Intercrystalline: water in the void spaces between crystals. Intracrystalline: water enters not only between the crystals but also between the units layers, which comprise the crystals. In less dense soils, expansion initially takes place in void areas before total volume expansion takes place (this can be seen as softening of the specimen). In densely packed soil, with low void space, the soil mass has to swell more or less immediately to accommodate the volume change. It also follows that expansive clays normally possess extremely low permeabilities. Whereas moderately expansive clays with higher permeabilities may swell more during a single wet season (period) than the more expansive clays. Undisturbed expansive clays often have a high resistance to deformation and swelling. When the micro structural arrangement of an expansive clay is disturbed (re-mixed or re-moulded) the clay may tend to swell more than that of other undisturbed counterparts.
Problematic Soils
If the Plastic Limit of a soil changes from say 27% to 47% due to the addition of Lime, are we creating a desiccated material which is De-stabilised instead of Stabilised?
Discussion
NATURAL MATERIAL
MODIFIED MATERIAL
DE-STABILISED MATERIAL
STABILISED MATERIAL