Professional Documents
Culture Documents
An exploration of the causes of terrorism and of the conditions that produce them
Michael A. Bozarth, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology University at Buffalo www.PsychologyofTerrorism.com
Perspectives on Terrorism
individuals groups
means-ends psychology uses terrorism when other means are not effective in achieving the desired ends individual and group traits are likely to be more subtle
Copyright 2006 Michael A. Bozarth, Ph.D.
Terrorism as a Syndrome
Terrorism as a Tool
Hybrid View
Emphasizes individual adaptations to the perception of social-political conditions (e.g., social cognition) Some individuals may more easily turn to terrorist solutions than others
Individual profiling potentially somewhat useful Some elements of both pathological and criminal terror
Copyright 2006 Michael A. Bozarth, Ph.D.
Out of the rubble of despair comes the hope for change . . . and another terrorist is born.
Social, political, and economic disparity breed discontent. Discontent sometimes leads to despair that can spawn terrorism. Civilizations once great often seek to return to their former grandeur. Religious fervor can give spiritual meaning to the struggle, and the struggle can provide purpose for life itself.
Modeling Behavior
Modeling behavior can explain many aspects of terrorist behavior for those born into a culture of terrorism, but it fails to explain the genesis of the terrorist movement
Modeling behavior may offer an adequate explanation for the soldiers but not for the leaders of terrorist movements Social learning approaches to understanding terrorism have limited utility
Copyright 2006 Michael A. Bozarth, Ph.D.
Terrorists Mindset
Identification of problem Social/political/economic injustice Identification of cause Oppressive group creating the inequity/injustice Identification of solution Radical change through the use of terror Process actualization Learning to Copyright 2006 Michael A. Bozarth, Ph.D. kill
Progression to Terrorist
The transition to terrorism might be viewed within the general framework of motivational psychology
To do or not to do? Approach Behavior (no conflict) Approach-Approach Conflict Approach-Avoidance Conflict
A simple motivational analysis focuses on the dynamic interactions of three classes of variables
Increased motivation to affect change Decreased competitive behaviors
Work merrily away pursuing the good life Increased effort to obtain goal through normal channels Search for alternative methods of obtaining goal Search for substitute goals
Copyright 2006 Michael A. Bozarth, Ph.D.
Goal obstructed
Multiple choices of goals complicate life and diminish motivational focus for any single goal People are much less willing to giveup their life when they have something to live for and not just the promise of a better afterlife
Copyright 2006 Michael A. Bozarth, Ph.D.
Single most important factor for understanding why some people progress from activists to terrorists Moral disengagement can explain the psychological transformation necessary for otherwise normal people to engage in terrorist activity
Copyright 2006 Michael A. Bozarth, Ph.D.
Homicide
accidental (most people are naturally capable) fit of rage (many people are naturally capable) premeditated (few people are naturally capable)
Moral Disengagement
From Bandura, 1990
Moral justification Sanitizing the language Diffusion or displacement of responsibility Attribution of blame to victims Dehumanization of victims
Three Variables Can Shift the Precarious Balance from Activism to Terrorism
Terrorism
Competing alternative behaviors Inhibition of violent behavior Motivation for change
Activism
Transitioning to Terrorism
l nt ora e M agem g en dis
Actual terrorists
thy pa Em
The reasons for the conflict are usually quite obvious The reasons for the transition into terrorist action are often less clear
Some Psychological Principles within the Realm of Normal Behavior Applicable to Terrorist Behavior
Frustration-aggression Displacement behavior (beyond above) Modeling behavior Social contagion (beyond above) Social cognition Moral disengagement Classical and operant conditioning
Copyright 2006 Michael A. Bozarth, Ph.D.
Levels of Involvement
They are essential to the organization They are often not easy to replace
Sources
Bandura, A., et al. (1996). Mechanism of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 364-374. Borum, R. (2003). Understanding the terrorist mind-set. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, July, 1-10.