Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SN findings
Recent trend shows quick growth by number and percentage of SN assessments compared to global (119/285) Any kind of government : State, province, region, canton, district, city More and more kinds of SNG, with various aggregates (1 entity, sample of entities at same level or not) Reasons for undertaking vary: needs from SNG (public service delivery, borrowing power), from CG (political dialogue, oversight, reform) and from donors (fiduciary risk, loans etc.)
SN assessments increase
Stock and flow of substantially completed assessments
120 100
Nombre de rapports
80
60 Stock 40 Flow
20
SN assessments increase
PEFA assessment report entity coverage
3%
21% Baseline central government Baseline 43% subnational government Repeat central government
33%
Establishing adequately differences between performances at national and local level sometimes not easy is the SN entity effectively impacted by regulations from central level? Problems may occur with some PI (e.g. scope of revenue indicators) Local experts/ assesors without PEFA exprience
Many thanks