Group Think

A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' strivings for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action

(Janis 1972: 9) When the desire for unanimity overcomes a groups ability to make rational assessments on all available information Can include an unquestioned belief in your moral correctness religious (give your life to God) or political (Nazi Germany) Reduces team effectiveness because it can remove the ability/need to question or validate

Group behaviour
Group Behaviour Positive and provides for trust, belonging, reliance, Resulting in being happy at work - better more efficient service Like minded people with similar ideas expectations Did not join public service to make a fortune Joined to
serve make a difference belong get self esteem (Maslow 1987)

Develop identity
Fitting-in (Baigent 2001) Surface acting that develops into deep acting (Hochschild 1983)

Culture can inclusive

Realise needs (Maslow 1987) Avoid alienation (Marx) Resisting deskilling (Braverman 1974)

Culture can be negative

Racism (Macpherson 1999) Sexism (Baigent 2008) Resist modernisation (Baigent 2007)

Outsiders seen as the

other (civvies) naive (what do they know about doing the job) deviant stereotyping (sanctions taken against groups) What are the stereotypes associated with being black? How might these affect a black male who wants to join the police? What are the stereotypes associated with women how will this effect women who want to join the fire and rescue service?

Formal Public Service Culture

Weberian Bureaucracy
Written rules (orders) for everything A clear chain of command No room for entrepreneurs Rationality rules An iron cage (Weber)

CAMBRIDGESHIRE FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICE - CFRS STRUCTURE

COMMUNITY SAFETY DIRECTORATE Lawrie Booth

CHIEF FIRE OFFICER TOM CARROLL

MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIRECTORATE Cheryl Rolph

DISTRICT COMMUNITY SAFETY CAMBRIDGE CITY DISTRICT Dave Warren EAST CAMBS DISTRICT Dave Robertson FENLAND DISTRICT Paul Fredericks

HUNTINGDON DISTRICT Peter Sharpe PETERBOROUGH DISTRICT Paul Malinowski SOUTH CAMBS DISTRICT Pat Kilby

FIRE CONTROL Elaine Wakerley

PERSONAL & ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP Maurice Moore

CORPORATE & DEMOCRATIC SERVICES GROUP Fiona Fowler

HUMAN RESOURCES Tracy BennettTighe/ Marissa Reynolds

TECHNICAL SERVICES DIRECTORATE Peter Warner

RESOURCES DIRECTORATE John Hummersone

FLEET & EQUIPMENT SERVICES GROUP Frank Laska

COMMUNITY RISK MANAGEMENT GROUP Gerry Dacey

FINANCE & CONTRACT MANGEMENTGROUP Matthew Warren

INFORMATION & COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY GROUP Martin Scott

NEW DIMENSIONS OFFICER Andy Dunlop

AUDIT OFFICER Mark Bennett-Tighe

PAYROLL TEAM Daphne Baker

PROPERTY & ESTATES GROUP Danny Rust

FF Competence confirmed through consistent performance. Eligible to access an NVQ award.

Appointment into Crew Management upon consistent demonstration of competence. Eligible to access an NVQ award.

Appointment into Watch Management upon consistent demonstration of competence. Eligible to access an NVQ award.

FIREFIGHTING FIREFIGHTER
Firefighting Development Programme Phase III

CREW CREW MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT

Crew Management Development Programme

WATCH WATCH MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT

Watch Management Development Programme Decision about progression to Station Management based upon information gathered from the Supervisory Management ADC and workplace assessment.

Firefighting Development Programme Phase II

Potential to develop beyond role identified through continuous workplace assessment and a snapshot of PQAs. CPD Test of Potential Firefighting Development Phase I

Decision about progression to Watch Management based upon information gathered from the Supervisory Management ADC and workplace assessment .

CPD
CPD Specialist Role Supervisory Management Assessment Centre Specialist Role Test of Potential Required training inputs Middle Management Assessment Centre

Attraction

Point of Entry Assessment

Required training inputs

Forming a society

Jones (1994) suggests that Durkheim has an orthodox consensus view of social structures made up of norms, values and rules. Durkheim argues we learn about norms, values and rules through socialisation Norms values and rules serve the function of making social life possible Each generation of people pass on these norms, values and rules to the next (tradition) Functionalists believe in a society formed by social structures Structures that become real in their consequences (W I Thomas) The argument of functionalist is that any social process exists because they serve a function For example we have laws because they lay down the boundaries of what is acceptable in a society Durkheim uses the term social solidarity to describe how people achieve social order Social solidarity was achieved by collective standards and rules of behaviour that make the social glue that holds society together Social solidarity/order flows from consensus - the existence of shared norms, values and rules When individuals do not feel they belong in a society share the same norms and values they feel alienated a situation that Durkheim saw as anomie Mayo, recognise that workers at Hawthorn suffered from anomie they did not feel as is they belonged during his experiment he made them feel important that they belonged and therefore they were happier and worked harder.

Durkheim
A collective way of living/being can be termed a culture Cultures can be macro gender, ethnicity, class Cultures can be micro family, work, teenagers Each generation has the ability to change their culture People have a choice if they comply or not In Public Services there are two cultures
Formal Informal

These arguments almost make as if culture has a life of its own

As a result, it is often the culture rather than individuals that is seen as responsible for how cultural values get put into practice Formal police culture may appear to have strength, power and authority, but this is due to a combination of group ownership, tradition and history, not because it actually exists. Police culture is a structure accepted/constructed by the individuals who operate within it

Because the culture has to be put into action by individuals, there is space for those individuals to act differently

It is sometimes possible to forget that:

People in the fire and police services have minds of their own Frequently group behaviour acts like a snowball almost forcing people to put their own values on hold as they to give up some free will to join in with the group People in the fire or police services make a choice when they join in on cultural practices Sometimes choice is not made under circumstances that the individual would choose

There can be a number of views about public service culture.

values that one cohort of public servants pass down to the next a common form of behaviour amongst public servants a public service ethos to serve and protect values that officers, managers, constables, firefighters, soldiers etc. have in common something people sign up to because it provides for your needs, a sense of belonging, identity, purpose

Alienation not here

Public Servants love their jobs Teamwork can prevent alienation from the work process Informal culture gives individuals some control over what they do The process of deskilling What do the workers feel

Tuckman, B. (1965) 'Developmental sequence in small groups', Psychological Bulletin 63(6):

Forming
Identifying the task and how to accomplish it. Deciding what is acceptable group behaviour and how to handle group conflict Deciding what information needs to be gathered to tackle the task Abstract conceptual discussions or some members' impatience with these discussions No clear focus on task or problem as evidenced by irrelevant discussions Complaining about organisational problems and barriers to accomplishing the task instead of focusing on the task

Storming
Arguing among group members, even if they agree on the issues Choosing sides within the group, bids for power, drawing divisional lines Tension, jealousy, lack of unity, and a perceived hierarchy Establishing unobtainable goals, increased concerns about too much work to be done.

Norming
Conflict avoidance in an attempt to promote harmony Friendlier discussions on a more personal level, more discussions about the dynamics of the group, begin to confide in one another More of a sense of group cohesion and esprit, more commonality of goals Establishing and maintaining realistic group parameters for behaviour and performance Organising how team will sanction transgressors

Performing
Constructively changing one's self-actually changing for the betterment of the group. Ability to avoid group conflict and, should conflict arise, being able to work through it. Much closer identity with the group, understanding each other's strengths and weaknesses.

Self-appointed peer group leaders members who protect the group Maintain/police behaviour Protect the current culture holding the accepted norms, values and rules in trust for the next generation An illusion of invulnerability, We know best Optimistic about your power Prepared to challenge managers covertly Ignore modernisation Collectively Rationalise your arguments Discount warnings Avoid reconsidering your assumptions Justify what you think Stick with past views (traditions) An unquestioned belief that the group is right Belief in the group's inherent morality Ignoring the real, ethical or moral consequences of your actions Stereotyped views of politicians managers public Too weak Too stupid Dont know whats going on Overcome any efforts to change Without solidarity we shall loose our way of knowing the job link this to a view about serving the public Make it clear that loyalty is key to solidarity Snowball and confront anyone who challenges the groups view Teach lessons about what it means to be marginalised Self-censorship Dont even consider the consequences of action or lack of reflection Distort incoming arguments Minimise/discount any thoughts that you might be wrong Shared illusion We are all together Sink or swim Silence is consent we permit what we allow/ignore

Norming and Action theories

Impression management (Goffman) Labelling theory (Becker) Deviancy amplification (Cohen)
What if you are black how might the police service label you What do the public services think of modernisation How does the label female affect you if you are applying for a job the fire service

Macpherson, W. (1999) The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry, London: HMSO.

6.44 We heed this warning, but upon all the facts we assert that the conclusion that racism played its part in this case is fully justified. Mere incompetence cannot of itself account for the whole catalogue of failures, mistakes, misjudgements, and lack of direction and control which bedevilled the Stephen 6.3 In this Inquiry we have not heard evidence of overt racism or discrimination, unless it can be said that the use of inappropriate expressions such as "coloured" or "negro" fall into that category. The use of such words, which are now well known to be offensive, displays at least insensitivity and lack of training. A number of officers used such terms, and some did not even during their evidence seem to understand that the terms were offensive and should not be used. 11.36 The main conclusion that we reach is that the inadequacy of the steps taken was as the result of the failure of direction by supervisory officers. The standard of command and co-ordination during the first two hours after this murder was in the opinion of the Inquiry abysmal. The collective failure of an organisation to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin. It can be seen or detected in processes, attitudes and behaviour which amount to discrimination through unwitting prejudice, ignorance, thoughtlessness and racist stereotyping which disadvantage minority ethnic people.

Bain, G. (2002) The Future of the fire service: reducing risk, saving lives, London: ODPM
10. Personnel policy, procedures and practices in the Fire Service give cause for concern. Despite clear policies from management and the FBU in favour of diversity, in practice only lip-service is paid to it. Harassment and bullying are still too prevalent.
The leadership must recognise that urgent action is required. An improved programme of HR management must be put in place as a matter of priority. The work on the introduction of the new Integrated Personal Development System (IPDS) gives a framework for this improvement programme. But the programme itself will not be a substitute for real effort by management at all levels to tackle the problems. (Bain 2002: V).

6.28 We have been told by many including some politicians that the leadership and general input from local politicians to fire authorities is poor. This is disappointing. If only because of the spotlight that has now been shone on the Service, it must be clear to all that good leadership and management have been lacking in many respects.

Positive Action another view

DB: So if there's a positive action day for ethnic minorities only, do you think, is that a good or a bad thing? Ff: I think thats racist. DB: You think its racist? LF: Yes, absolutely. Its out and out discrimination against the white, well, every other. It basically says it doesnt matter if you apply or not, theyre not interested in you as a person or interested in this group or this group at this time.

FireWorks
for equality in the fire service

Barriers of Ethnic Minority Recruitment

Perceived Barriers Cultural sensitivities prohibited some BEM groups from applying Religious restrictions prevented other ethnic groups from applying Asians saw the firefighting profession as a low-status career Problem of recruitment rested with BEM groups

I think therefore I am

Fitting-in