Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microfiltration
Dan Libotean - Alessandro Patti PhD students Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Catalunya
Definition of a membrane
A membrane can be defined as a barrier (not necessarily solid) that separates two phases as a selective wall to the mass transfer, making the separation of the components in a mixture possible.
Permeate
Feed
Driving Force
Phase 2
Phase 1
2
MF - UF - NF
MF - UF - NF
MF
Dialysis
UF
RO
Other
MF - UF - NF
MF - UF - NF
Cumulative capacity of MF
50 40 30 20 10 0 '86-'88 '89-'90 '91-'92 '93-'94 '95-'96
Number of plants
MF - UF - NF
Driving Forces
A driving force can make the mass transfer through the membrane possible; A driving force can make the mass transfer through the membrane possible; usually, the driving force can be aapressure difference (P), aaconcentration usually, the driving force can be pressure difference (P), concentration difference (c), an electrical potential difference (E). difference (c), an electrical potential difference (E). Membranes can be classified according their driving forces: Membranes can be classified according their driving forces:
P Microfiltration
Ultrafiltration Nanofiltration Reverse osmosis Piezodialysis
c
Pervaporation Gas separation Vapour permeation Dialysis Diffusion dialysis
T
Thermo-osmosis Membrane distillation
E
Electrodialysis Electro-osmosis Membrane electrolysis
MF - UF - NF
Mid-size organic substances, Bacteria, parasites, particles substances, single charged ions HighLow molecular molecular substances, viruses multiple charged ions
MF - UF - NF 8
MF - UF - NF
Porous MF membranes consist of polymeric matrix in which pores Porous MF membranes consist of polymeric matrix in which pores are present. are present. The existence of different pore geometries implies that different The existence of different pore geometries implies that different mathematical models have been developed to describe transport mathematical models have been developed to describe transport phenomena. phenomena.
MF - UF - NF 10
Transport equations
The Hagen-Poiseuille and the Kozeny-Carman equations can be applied to demonstrate the flow of water through membranes. The use of these equations depends on the shapes and sizes of the pores. 1. Hagen-Poiseuille J the solvent flux P pressure difference x thickness of membrane tortuosity viscosity r the pore radius surface porosity
r P J= 8 x
2
cylindrical pores
MF - UF - NF
11
Transport equations
2. Kozeny-Carman
P J= 2 KS x
3
S surface area per unit volume K Kozeny-Carman constant (depends on the pore geometry)
MF - UF - NF
12
. Stretching Stretching
MF - UF - NF
13
2. Track-etching Track-etching
15
HEAT pore
MF - UF - NF
16
Materials used
Synthetic polymeric membranes: a) Hydrophobic a) Hydrophilic Ceramic membranes Alumina, Al2O3 Alumina, Al2O3 Zirconia, ZrO2 Zirconia, ZrO2 Titania, TiO2 Titania, TiO2 Silicium Carbide, SiC Silicium Carbide, SiC
MF - UF - NF
PTFE, teflon PTFE, teflon PVDF PVDF PP PP PE PE Cellulose esters Cellulose esters PC PC PSf/PES PSf/PES PI/PEI PI/PEI PA PA PEEK PEEK
17
Materials used
1. Polymeric MF membranes
Track-etching
MF - UF - NF 18
Materials used
2. Ceramic MF membranes
MF - UF - NF
19
Modules
A module is the simplest membrane element that can be used in practice. Module design must deal with the following issues: 1. Economy of manufacture 1. Economy of manufacture 2. Membrane integrity against 2. Membrane integrity against damage and leaks damage and leaks 3. Sufficient mass transfer to keep 3. Sufficient mass transfer to keep polarization in control polarization in control
MF - UF - NF
4. Minimum waste of energy 4. Minimum waste of energy 5. Easy egress of 5. Easy egress of permeate permeate 6. Permit the membrane 6. Permit the membrane to be cleaned to be cleaned
20
Modules: tubular
Membranes diameter: >0.5 mm Active layer: inside the tube Flux velocity: high (up to 5 m/s) Tube: reinforced with fiberglass or stainless steel Number of tubes: 4-18 Flux: one or more channels Cleaning: easy Surface area/volume: low
MF - UF - NF 21
Symmetric membranes
The cross section The cross section shows aa uniform shows uniform and regular structure and regular structure
surface
23
Asymmetric membranes
0.1/0.5 m
Same material!
Porous irregular layer Porous with toplayer
50/150 m
The active layer is supported The active layer is supported over the porous layer. over the porous layer.
Resistances-in-series model to describe the flux decline: Resistances-in-series model to describe the flux decline:
J: flow P: pressure drop : viscosity Rm: membrane resistance time, t Rc: cake resistance
25
P J= ( Rm + Rc )
MF - UF - NF
flux, J
R p : pore blocking Ra : adsorption Rm : membrane Rg : gel layer formation Rcp : concentration polarization
Rm= Rm(t=0)+Ra+Rp;; Rc=Rg+Rcp Rm= Rm(t=0)+Ra+Rp Rc=Rg+Rcp Rtot=Rm+Rc Rtot=Rm+Rc
MF - UF - NF
Rp Ra Rm
Rcp Rg
26
Back-flushing
a. Heat treatment Hydraulic cleaning Hydraulic cleaning a.a.a. Reducing pore size distribution a. Narrow pore size distribution a. Reducingconcentration polarisation a.a. Heat treatment Narrow concentration polarisation b. pH adjustament velocity b. a1.Mechanicalcleaning b. Mechanical cleaning b. Hydrophilic flux velocity pH adjustament b. a1.Increasingmembranes Increasing flux b. Addition of complexing agents Hydrophilic membranes c. Chemical of complexing agents c.c. a2.Chemicalcleaning c. a2.Using low flux membranes Additionlow flux membranes Using cleaning d. Chlorination d. Electric cleaning Electric promoters b.d. Turbulencecleaning d. Turbulencepromoters Chlorination b. e. Adsorption onto active carbon e. Adsorption onto active carbon f. Chemical clarification f. Chemical clarification
MF - UF - NF
27
Back-flushing
permeate suspension
permeate suspension
permeate
P J
Restorable pressure with back-flushing Irreversible fouling Restorable flux with back-flushing Irreversible fouling starting points starting points
permeate
t
MF - UF - NF 28
1. Dead-end
Feed
2. Cross-flow
Feed
Retentate
Permeate
Cake layer
MF - UF - NF
Permeate
29
Available MF membranes
Pore size, m Module Material 2, 3, 5 1.4 1 0.45 0.45 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 T T T T FH T FH FH T FH C C C C PSf C PP PP/PF C PSf Membrane area per module, m2 0.02 7.1 0.005 7.4 0.09 10.0 0.13 11.5 0.01 3.7 0.02 7.1 2.0 10.8 15 0.02 7.1 0.01 3.7
MF - UF - NF
Producer US Filters US Filters CTI TechSep Ceramen AG Technology US Filters Akzo Memtec US Filters AG Technology
30
MF process applications
1. To replace four unit operations in the waste water treatment process.
Waste water COAG/ FLOC MF
MIX
Pre Filter
SED
MF - UF - NF
31
MF process applications
2. To eliminate organic matter using MF after a pre-treatment with coagulants
Waste water
Pre Filter
MF
Coagulants
Water
MF - UF - NF
32
MF process applications
3. MF as pre-treatment for RO or NF RO
Waste water Water
Pre Filter
MF
NF
Water
MF - UF - NF
33
1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5.
Sent to aatreatment plant Sent to treatment plant Discharged into aabody of water Discharged into body of water Sent to aastorage facility Sent to storage facility For ground applications For ground applications Recycled back to water source Recycled back to water source
MF - UF - NF
34
Membrane Separations
Ultrafiltration & Nanofiltration
Membrane separation
SPECIES RANGE OF DIMENSIONS (NM)
Yeasts and fungi Bacteria Oil emulsions Colloidal solids Viruses Proteins, polysaccharides Enzymes Common antibiotics Organic molecules Inorganic ions Water
MF - UF - NF
1000-10000 300-10000 100-10000 100-1000 30-300 2-10 2-5 0.6-1.2 0.3-0.8 0.2-0.4 0.2
37
Membrane separation
MF - UF - NF
38
Membrane separation
MF - UF - NF
39
Membrane characterization
Membrane properties Membrane separation properties
rejection rejection separation factor separation factor enrichment factor enrichment factor
pore size pore size pore size distribution pore size distribution free volume free volume crystalinity crystalinity
MF - UF - NF
40
Membrane characterization
Membranes
porous nonporous
Driving force pressure difference (0.1 - 1 bar) pressure difference (0.5 10 bar) pressure difference (5 20 bar)
MF - UF - NF
MF - UF - NF
42
1. Pore geometries
Hagen-Poiseuille equation
r P J= 8 x
2
J the solvent flux P pressure difference x thickness of membrane tortuosity viscosity r the pore radius the surface porosity
MF - UF - NF
43
1. Pore geometries
P J= 2 2 K S (1 ) x
MF - UF - NF 44
1. Pore geometries
top layer thickness 0.1-1m sub layer thickness 50-150m
commercial interest
45
MF - UF - NF
46
r = np Am
MF - UF - NF
47
(pore size, pore size distribution, top layer thickness, surface porosity) s permeation-related parameters (actual separation parameters using solutes that are more or less retained by the membranes - cut-off measurements*)
* cut-off is defined as the molecular weight which is 90% rejected by the membrane
MF - UF - NF
48
scanning electron microscopy bubble-point method mercury intrusion porometry permeation measurements
gas adsorption-desorption thermoporometry permporometry liquid displacement rejection measurement transmission electron microscopy
MF - UF - NF
49
Ultrafiltration
... separation of one component of a solution from another component by means of pressure and flow exerted on a semipermeable membrane, with membrane pore sizes ranging from 0.05 m to 1nm. is used begining with years 30 the operating pressure 0.1-5 bar typically used to retain macromolecules and colloids the lower limit are solutes with molecular weights of a few thousands Daltons (1Dalton 1.66.10-24g) average flux around 50-200 GFD (~ 80-340 l/m2.h), at an operating pressure of 50 psig (~ 3,5bar)
MF - UF - NF
50
Ultrafiltration
Membranes used:
polymeric - polysulfone/poly(ether sulfone)/sulfonated polysulfone - poly(vinylidene fluoride) - polyacrilonitrile - cellulosics - polyimide/poly(ether imide) - aliphatic polyamides - polyetheretherketone ceramic - alumina (Al2O3) - zirconia (ZrO2)
MF - UF - NF 51
Ultrafiltration
Process performance do not depend only to the intrinsic membrane properties, but also to the occurence of different phenomena: concentration polarization fouling adsorption
MF - UF - NF
52
Concentration polarization
The concentration of removed species is higher near the membrane surface than it is in the bulk of the stream. Result: a boundary layer of substantially high concentration permeate of inferior quality Resolution: high fluid velocities are maintaned along the membrane surface
MF - UF - NF 53
Fouling
Build-up of impurities in the membrane that can keep it from functioning properly.
MF - UF - NF
54
Ultrafiltration
Crossflow Mode
MF - UF - NF
55
Ultrafiltration
Dead End Mode
MF - UF - NF
56
Cleaning
Cleaning in Backwash mode
MF - UF - NF
57
Cleaning
Cleaning in Forward Flush mode
MF - UF - NF
58
Adsorption
The main factor enhancing this phenomenon is hydrophobic interaction between the surface of the membrane and substance molecules. Hydrophobic groups are more prone to adsorbtion than hydrophilic groups
Hydrophobic
MF - UF - NF
Hydrophilic
59
Adsorption
The number of molecules adsorbed on the surface, can be reduced by modifying hydrophobic membrane surface to hydrophylic membrane surface.
Ultrafiltration
Applications:
food and dairy industry (the concentration of milk and cheese making, the recovery of whey proteins, the recovery of potato starch and proteins, the concentration of egg products, the clarification of fruit juices and alcoholic beverages) pharmaceutical industry (enzymes, antibiotics, pyrogens) textile industry chemical industry metallurgy (oil-water emulsions, electropaint recovery) paper industry leather industry sub layers in composite mebranes for nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, gas separation or prevaporation
MF - UF - NF 61
Ultrafiltration
Factors affecting the performance: flow across the membrane surface high flow velocity high permeate rate operating pressure due to increased fouling and compaction, pressures rarely exceed 100 psig (1 psig=0.068948 bar) operating temperature high temperature high permeate rate
MF - UF - NF
62
Nanofiltration
...used when low molecular weight solutes as inorganic salts or small organic molecules (glucose, sucrose) have to be separated. pore size < 2 nm the operating pressure 10-20 bar material directly influences the separation nanofiltration membranes are considered intermediate between porous and nonporous membranes most of the nanofiltration membranes are charged two models for the separation mechanism 1. permeation through a micropore 2. the solution-diffusion into the membrane matrix
MF - UF - NF 63
Don
RT a A RT a B = = ln m = ln m z A F a A z BF a B
- the electrical potential z - the valence R - the gas constant F - the Faraday constant T - the temperature a - the activity of the solutes m refers to the membrane phase, while A and B are the components in the solution
MF - UF - NF 64
MF - UF - NF
65
Nanofiltration
Membranes for which the Donnan exclusion seems to play an important role
MF - UF - NF
Nanofiltration
Membranes for which the diffusion seems to play an important role
nonporous membrane
MF - UF - NF 67
Nanofiltration
Membranes used:
asymmetric structure: top layer <1m, sub layer ~50-150m asymmetric membranes (prepared by phase inversion techniques) - cellulose esters pH range 5-7, temperature < 30oC (for avoiding the hydrolysis of the polymer) - polyamides - polybenzimidazoles, polybenzimidazolones, polyamidehydrazide, polyimides composite membranes - first stage is preparing the porous sub layer - placing a thin dense layer on the top of the sub layer: dip coating, in-situ polymerization, interfacial polymerization, plasma polymerization
MF - UF - NF 68
Nanofiltration
Applications:
desalination of brackish and seawater to produce potable water producing ultrapure water for the semiconductor industry retention of bivalent ions such as Ca2+, CO32retention of micropollutants and microsolutes such as: herbicides, insecticides, pesticides, dyes, sugar
MF - UF - NF
69