Professional Documents
Culture Documents
presents
- simplified
Relations Diagram also known as Interrelationship digraph is a tool for finding solution to problems that have complex causal relationship. This helps to untangle and find the logical relations among the intertwined causes and effects. It is a creative process which allows for Multidirectional rather than linear thinking to be used.
Concept
a) Is relations diagram similar to cause-effect diagram relationship ?
In many respect Relations Diagram is similar to Cause and Effect Diagram. Cause and Effect Diagram is very powerful and useful when we are dealing with problems with which we are familiar.
The difference between the two is that in case of Cause and Effect Diagram we can predetermine the major causes but in Relations Diagram we carry out the process first through which the major factors are identified later..
Normally, Relations Diagram is used when normal methods do not yield result or when we are probing into an unknown area or process.
Hence opinions can be freely expressed and there is no preconceived design for this. Hence, the same problem may have different analysis when dealt by different teams. However, if the teams are of similar capabilities, findings will not be varying much.
Advantages
Advantages
We can also convert it into a cause and effect diagram once the causal factor and their relationships are established.
Advantages
This relation diagram will help us to decide the responsibilities of all people
It enables to find out the responsibilities of various agencies in the activity process.
Advantages
Advantages
S S
U
MAIN ISSUES
S R
Disadvantages
I KNOW DIFFERENT
PICTURE WILL EMERGE FROM DIFFERENT GROUP, BUT LOOK FOR SIMILARITIES IN SUB FACTORS.
It has no prescribed format. Hence different pictures can emerge from different groups for one single problem.
Disadvantages
Sometimes it can be very complex, one has to patiently draw, putting down the details appropriately.
Disadvantages
It is time consuming and it has to be used only when normal methods do not yield results.
Disadvantages
Which information I should use?The one prepared for Board meeting, the one for financial institute, or the one prepared for export promotion. The right one finance is not prepared to divulge!!
If authentic and correct information are not collected the whole exercise will be useless and waste.
Disadvantages
He is our Finance Directors Brother in law. We have taken him for that special study and data collection.
Disadvantages
Over enthusiasm and too many details can only complicate and confuse.
Disadvantages
I Think we should redraw it for better understanding.
More often than not it may require redrawing for deeper study of the problem.
a.
Here we put the problem or issue under discussion in the centre. Then write down the causal factors around it. Once the process is over, start drawing the arrows connecting them. This is also known as centrally converging Relations Diagram.
Low morale
b. Uni-directional type
Here we write down the problem or issue on the left or right side. Then start writing the causal factors on both the sides i.e., up and down and then connect them with the arrows. This is also known as Directionally Intensive Relations Diagram.
Training
Insufficient checks
Insufficient revision
English abbreviations
Education
MARKET TROUBLE
Labelling errors
Unnoticed Incomplete operating instructions Operation directions are vague Insufficient knowledge Guidance Capabilities Education Too few people who understand the operation Feasible operations Other charges and misjudgements Modified instructions are vague Insufficient supervision are vague
Inspection error
Checkers
Environment
In Relations indicative type the problem or issue is written down at the beginning. Then the causal factors are written on the side and below and are inter connected. This is also known as Relationship Indication Relations Diagram.
Prompt experimentation
Equipment review
Resources review
Materials
Personnel
Capital
Regulations Top Management Managerial structure Product development information Claim information Quality assurance structure Inspection structure Inspection standards
Work objectives
Functional analysis
Major functions
Quality Control
Management items at each occupational level Volume Control
Middle Management
Process management
Cost Control
QC Circle teams Managerial intent
Supervisory Level
Management of materials
Process improvement
QC organization
Management
- Where various factors and number of agencies are involved for a given task
For assessing the responsibilities of various agencies involved and interlinking factors
- It helps to have broad, overall picture before a policy guideline or an office order is issued.
- It opens up thinking and every issue get highlighted before a decision could be taken.
Where multiple objectives are involved in an issue or problem with many agencies Relations Diagram is quite useful.
Caution
I have fixed the leaky pipe here. I hope it is not causing problem somewhere else.
While tackling issues through Relations Diagram care should be taken to see that other areas are not affected by this.
Caution
ACCIDENTS PRODUCTION
For example a safety device tackled to prevent accidents should not result in lowering of productivity.
Caution
Basically Relations Diagram is used where multiple agencies are involved in the issue.
a. Policy Management
Focal point of policy management is setting goals based on the gap between the desired state and present state to bridge the gap. This is normally a problem area. Before issuing orders it is better to see what can be the possible effect of such orders and what need to be done to overcome such problem.
PRESENT STATE
DESIRED STATE
Living up to TQC is also not easy. If somebody tells you that it does not require more work, at least in the short run he is not being realistic.
It is better to see in advance as to what are the additional work, time and cost involvement before implementing it.
Can we spare time and money? That is the first question to be answered. If this is not done, programme will end up in a disastrous way however good the intentions may be.
If TQC implementation is taken up many issues may need analysis where Relations Diagram will be useful.
In todays market condition, this is very important and also calls for a lot of preparation. Many times market share does not depend upon customer preference alone.
A blind test done about two products showed that the customer preference was almost equal for both the products.
Customer Preference
Market Share
Even then product A had 80% market share and the product B had only 10%.
It was because product A was in the market much before product B and product B needed lot of marketing effort to be put in and also meeting the demands of the customers. But getting into the market first without proper preparation is also not a desirable action.
An internationally reputed detergent manufacturer introduced a new product which had an excellent acceptance.
Another equally reputed competitor used the opportunity to flood the market with a similar product and captured a major market share.
NEW
Even now the first manufacturer is unable to make a dent in the market share, having lost the initiative.
In all these, use of Relations Diagram will help to arrive at proper action plan.
d. Service Complaints
After sales service is an essential aspect of quality management. Depending upon the product or service one should know to anticipate which kind of service complaint he may face and how to tackle the situation etc. They are needed requirements.
Service Complaints
Here too use of Relations Diagram will help to understand and to plan the actions needed.
For such chronic problems and for problems which are serious and complicated use of Relations Diagram is ideal. This will help to trace out multiple causal factors responsible for the overall quality deterioration status and to find appropriate solutions.
a) When it is too divergent many conflicting views and opinion can emerge affecting free flow of information and thinking.
Oh! Your ideas are always great ! How can I think otherwise?
b) When it is too homogeneous, new factors may not emerge as the level of thinking may be identical.
c) In a Quality Circle for instance, it is homogeneous only with respect to work area but comprises of different levels of artisans or operators. Hence it is a desirable composition.
Step - 2
Preparatory Meeting
In a familiar group like a quality improvement team (managerial level) or a Quality Circle (Workers level), we can straight away venture into action.
But in problems, which could not be tackled by other methods, a preliminary meeting would still help all, in better understanding of the problem.
Step - 3
Simple problems do not need a Relations Diagram. If it is complex and any other analytical methods do not help to arrive at the root causes, only then Relation Diagram should be tried.
A Relations Diagram can be an extension of any of the following for deeper analysis :a) from an Affinity Diagram b) from a Tree Diagram c) from a Cause and Effect Diagram
Step-4 Define and clarify the problem and proceed with discussion
The group leader should explain the problem clearly so that everyone understands it. Allow time for pondering over the various aspects of the problem until the next meeting and also to enable collection of relevant information.
Sometimes we may have information readily available in which case more time for reflecting over the problem may not be necessary.
IDEA! IDEA!
IDEA!
IDEA! IDEA!
IDEA!
In the next meeting proceed with systematic brain storming to get ideas.
Write down all ideas as they emanate from the team members on a (i) Transparency for OHP or (ii) on a flip chart or (iii) a black board for further discussions.
IDEAS
IDEAS
Ideal number of ideas would be 2530 which need not be too minute nor in detail.
IDEAS
Complex ideas can be broken up into elements and COMPLEX IDEAS presented.
Finally it is better to restrict the quantity and attention is paid to each point to analyze and arrive at the root cause.
Transfer each idea generated on to a card. For expressing ideas use simple, direct and crisp sentences. (telegraphic language like). The sentence should be meaningful and easily understandable to all. Check understanding of members.
Either use a large sheet of paper or a glass board. Use removable paste slips so that you can easily change the slips as a result of discussions later.
. . .
.
...
...
cause
effect
cause
effect
Going from a particular cause to the effect paste the slips along side and connect them with an arrow from cause to the effect.
Similarly fix other slips, drawing arrows from cause to the effect.
EFFECT CAUSE
CAUSE
As shown some causes may have relationship with other effects also and they also have to be connected with an arrow.
EFFECT
ALRIGHT
AGREE OK
I AGREE
I AGREE
There should be consensus of the groups on the causal factors and effect factors through proper understanding.
When an arrow has to pass through another arrow, draw a bridge as shown.
Members can study the diagram leisurely and also discuss with their colleagues in their work area who may not be in the team.
Individual members may change the cause and effect statements on their diagram where they feel necessary in a different colour pen.
In the next meeting each one should explain the changes he has made and also why it was made. This will enable deeper study.
Step -9
Final Review
A final review is made of the changes made by members and eventually a consensus will emerge on the final diagram.
Action Plan
ANGLE AFTER LAPPING
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
On the final diagram that has emerged, if need be, fine tune it with the assistance of a scatter diagram or histogram to arrive at a solution that may be needed
Action Plan
Select key points, followup, prioritize action plan that is needed in a sequence.
Next step is action plan. Some of the issues may call for changes in the existing method.
ACTION PLAN
Do not make drastic changes without ensuring that such changes will help.
ACTION PLAN
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
90
Based on all these, select key issues which call for further action. That means prioritizing. This depends upon the issue and our knowledge about it.
Examine the point where many arrows converge - this could be a key point or issue
You may not see too many arrows to that issue, but you will all agree match fixing is an important point.
Sometimes even points with minimum arrow can be a key point or issue.
Thank God and Arrow Diagram! Now we have a clear understanding of the problem and the process. Finding t out the key issues will be easy.
A good understanding of the problem and the process will enable members to assess and arrive at the key issues correctly.
Now that key issues are identified let us have a consensus on action plan, Gentlemen!
Step - 11
Final Diagram
After the preceding 10 steps a final diagram will be available to the team
Highlight key issues with special shading or bordering of the rectangles or the ovals as the case may be.
Example:
Now let us take the example of pep up activities needed to stimulate and sustain TQM in an organization.
3. Assign responsibilities.
4. Give power for function.
7. Individual award.
8. 9.
15. Survival.
16. Lessons from failures. 17. Spirit of employees. 18. Ill effects of not implementing. 19. General feeling. 20. Fear. 21. Cost of quality.
Happiness
Fear
Spirit of employees
SUCCESS STORIES
Reflect in appraisal
General feelings
Group award
Individual award
Reduced benefits
Problems of America
Propagations of success
Assign responsibilities
ROI
Put pressur e
Customer Complaints
Competition
Improvement in performance
Priorities
Fund requirement
LHS Brain
1. Intellect
RHS Brain
1. Emotive Capacity 2. Comprehensive Capabilities 3. Empathic Capacity, Behaviour
2. Analytical Ability
3. Critical Ability 4. Linguistic Ability
4. Non-Linguistic Abilities
The new 7 tools are attributed to the LHS and RHS of brain as stated below according to the originators of this concepts
LHS Brain
1. Relations Diagram 2. Systematic or tree Diagram 3. Matrix Diagram 4. Arrow Diagram 5. PDPC Method
RHS Brain
Affinity diagram
From the above explanation itself it would be clear that the Relation Diagram and Affinity Diagram vary as each requires different sides of the brain.
6. Based on the findings of the root causes remedial actions would have to start.
EXAMPLES
They all can be put under one group in Affinity Diagram. Here they do not have a cause effect relationship but belong to the group Training.
EXAMPLES
WHERE
Relations Diagram is basically a logical process and uses cause and effect process. In case of cause and effect diagram we proceed from main causes to sub causes, sub-sub causes etc. Here in Relations Diagram even the inter-relationship between the sub causes are established. While the structure may have a clumsy look it helps to establish the intensity of the relationship thereby giving a more realistic picture.