BSILI Pre-Institute Survey

Click to edit Master subtitle style June 7, 2012

Christina A. Christie Michael A. Harnar

6/18/12

Evaluation Purpose
Provide data for formative development

Event surveys; Observations; Case studies Develop outcome indicators for impact assessment

Build capacity

Trainings; Event participation

Strategic planning

Logic modeling; Project development

6/18/12

Impact Inquiry
Activity at three levels

Campus networks

BSI committees/Student Success collaboratives working groups

Informal Campus

activity

Regional networks
Network

activities (events)

Applications on campus

Usefulness

Familiarity Event

with the network

6/18/12

participation (mapping)

Data Collection Methods

Event participant surveys 3CSN campuses faculty survey (o-x-o-x) Case Study Acceleration practices survey Network analysis (mapping & CCC survey)

6/18/12

Your Pre-Institute Survey

Email Invitation May 18 (2 follow-ups)

N=43

Web link May 21 Closed June 1 39 started; 31 completed 91% response rate; 72% completion rate

6/18/12

Primary Role in Student Success (n=39)

Other

Librarian Director

Learning Resource Center I am classified staff and one of the

tri-chairs of our Basic Skills Standing Committee on our campus.

Activity Director of a Title V

Grant, which focuses on success in first year students Counselor

Student Service Faculty Faculty Grant Lead English Department Chair &

Instructor/ Division Chair (like a 6/18/12 dean)

Colleges (n=39)
College Chabot College Grossmont College Los Angeles Pierce College Santa Rosa Junior College West Valley College Antelope Valley College College of San Mateo Fresno City College % # College Fullerton College Gavilan College Los Angeles Mission College Los Medanos College Pasadena City College Sacramento City College American River College Yuba College 6/18/12 % 5.1 % 5.1 % 5.1 % 5.1 % 5.1 % 5.1 % 2.6 % 2.6 % # 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1

17.9 7 % 7.7% 3 7.7% 3 7.7% 3 7.7% 5.1% 5.1% 5.1% 3 2 2 2

Years Worked in CC System (n=38)

6/18/12

Departments (n=39)

Library

Business & Technology History The Learning Resource Center assist all disciplines Student Services I am an ESL instructor by trade Counseling Biology and Center for Teaching & Learning Biology DSPS/EOPS/CalWORKs Chemistry Business & Technology

6/18/12

Years Taught in a CC (n=37)

6/18/12

Years Working in Student Success (n=37)

6/18/12

Percentage of Time Last Academic Year on Student Success (n=38)

6/18/12

Familiarity with Student Success Efforts(n=37)

8 6/18/12

10

12

Goals Top 3 Combined (n=37)

6/18/12

Campus Network Descriptions (n=31)

6/18/12

Levels Networking

Purpose Dialog and common understanding Clearinghouse for information Create base of support Match needs and provide coordination Limit duplication of services Ensure tasks are done

Structure Nonhierarchical Loose/flexible link Roles loosely defined Community action is primary link among members Central body of people as communication hub Semiformal links Roles somewhat defined Links are advisory Group leverages/raises money

Process Low key leadership Minimal decision making Little conflict Informal communication Facilitative leaders Complex decision making Some conflict Formal communications within the central group

Cooperation or Alliance

Coordination or Partnership

Coalition

Cooperation or Alliance: A central body of people as a communication hub with semi-formal, advisory links and somewhat defined roles, facilitative leaders, complex decision making and formal communications within the central group. The purpose is to match needs and provide coordination, limit duplication of services, and ensure tasks are done.
Share resources to address common issues Merge resource base to create something new Central body of people consists of decision makers Roles defined Links formalized Group develops new resources and joint budget Share ideas and be willing to pull resources from existing systems Develop commitment for a minimum of three years Accomplish shared vision and impact benchmarks Build interdependent system to address issues and opportunities Consensus used in shared decision making Roles, time and evaluation formalized Links are formal and written in work assignments

Autonomous leadership but focus in on issue Group decision making in central and subgroups Communication is frequent and clear

All members involved in decision Shared leadership making Decision making formal with all members Roles and time defined Communication is common and prioritized Links formal with written agreement Group develops new resources and joint budget

Collaboration

Leadership high, trust level high, productivity high Ideas and decisions equally shared Highly developed communication

6/18/12

How would you rate the Student Success Initiative leadership on your campus in its effort to provide the following support? (n=35)

5 6/18/12

How would you rate the student success-focused work on your campus on the following functions? (n=34)

5 6/18/12

To what extent has your participation in student success-related programs on your campus contributed to any of the following changes in how your campus approaches its student success work? (n=33)

6/18/12

To what extent has your participation in student success-related programs contributed to any of the following changes in how you teach? (n=32)

5 6/18/12

Wilder Collaboration Factors Inventory

40 statements

20 factors

6/18/12

Exercise
~3 Factors per table discuss and define based on

your experience

Each table describes Each person rates their own campus on all 20 factors

6/18/12

Wilder Factors 1-10

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

6/18/12

Wilder Factors 1-10

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

6/18/12

Wilder Factors 11-20

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

6/18/12

Wilder Factors 11-20

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

6/18/12

Network Visuals

6/18/12

Network Visuals

http://www.arcgis.com/explorer/?open=1033e0e7ec9a49

11738144.8871681,5214157.61604441

6/18/12

Click to edit Master subtitle style Harnar.michael@gmail.com

Tina.christie@ucla.edu

6/18/12