Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GENERATOR:
SOURCE OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY
TRANSMISSIO N LINE:
TRANSMITTING POWER
LOAD:
CONSUMING POWER
25% 100%
175.00 MW
300.0 MW
8
FAIR AND NON-DISCRIMINATORY ECONOMICALLY EFFICIENT TRANSPARENT AND NON-AMBIGUOUS FEASIBLE COMPATIBLE WITH MARKET
10
11
12
When NTCs are used as an upper limit of the available transmission capacity, no further capacity can be allocated by TSOs once the limit is reached. Then the method requires that a mechanism to define the priority for using NTCs be implemented. ADVANTAGE: No additional costs are incurred, and thus there is no allocation or cost allocation mechanism. DRAWBACKS: Curtailment of transactions based on NTCs publication does not convey any economic incentive. It does not provide incentives to TSOs, generators, distributors, traders and therefore does not promote efficient trade.
13
The auctioning method is efficient regarding competition :bids reflect exactly the real market value as perceived by the participants, the highest priority for access being granted to the one who is ready to pay the highest price. ADVANTAGE: The auctioning system allows TSOs to handle constraints for cross-border trading, without providing any physical information except NTC. DRAWBACKS: Auctioning raises a transmission risk on long or mid-term bilateral contracts (there is no guarantee that they will be accepted every day)
14
This method consists of splitting a power exchange (PEX) into geographical bid areas Each area has its own pool price : areas downstream of a congestion will have a higher pool price, areas upstream of a congestion will have a lower pool price When the price-demand effect is observed, demand decreases as price increases ADVANTAGE: On a long-term basis, customers may react to high prices in congested areas by substituting other forms of energy to electricity DRAWBACKS: It is not feasible on a large scale
15
Redispatch effectively allows extending trade through reoptimisation despite physical boundaries, till there is no generation possibilities left to redispatch ADVANTAGE: The advantage of publishing likely congestion costs in advance is that it allows good visibility of these issues to all participants. DRAWBACKS: Preparing the above cost curve places significant computational difficulties on the TSOs
16
17
It is assumed that the market knows market limits (NTCs published by TSOs). This situation could be supported by any number of contracts, but G2, G3 and G4 between them can only contract up to 280 MW (2 x 100 MW + 2 x 40 MW NTC). The access to B-A and B-C interconnectors is allocated according to chosen priority rules.
18
An efficient market is assumed (the market has enough information as to adjust generation with respect of NTCs) with : G1 200 MW G2 200 MW G3 80 MW G4 0 MW G5 20 MW This situation could be supported by any number of contracts. Assuming that G2 has contracted with D2 and D3, G3 and G4 could be competing in the auction for capacity between B and A, and between B and C. G3 could obtain 80 MW of capacity in this auction.
19
20
21
22
LMP LOCAL MARGINAL PRICES TUT TRANSMISSION USAGE TARIFF LMP lossless = EP + CR LMP loss= EP + CR + LC EP ENERGY PRICE CR CONGESTION REVENUE LC TRANSMISSION LOSSES COST LMP-TUT = EP + CR + LC + TUT
23
24
Format-I National
Total Transfer Capability for mmmm ,yyyy Issue Date: Issue Time: Revision No.
Corridor/ Date Control Area Time Period Reliabili Total ty Available Transfer Margin Transfer Capabili (RM) ty (TTC) Capability (ATC)
Remarks:
25
Format II
26
NOTICE FOR LIFTING OF CONGESTION CHARGE Congestion charge on Unscheduled Interchange (UI) energy that was applicable w.e.f hh:mm of dd/mm/yyyy vide notice umber.... issued at hh:mm of dd/mm/yyyy would be lifted w.e.f time block no. (hh:mm) of dd/mm/yyyy. Shift Charge Manager
27
28